Remifentanil versus propofol sedation for peribulbar anesthesia

Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 583-593

  Dal, D ^a   Demirtas M ^a   Sahin, A ^a   Aypar, U ^a   Irkec M ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anesthetics i.v: remifentanil, propofol; Intraocular pressure; Sedation

Indexed keywords

HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT; OXYGEN; PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL;

AGED; BLOOD; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; CATARACT EXTRACTION; EYE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; OXYGEN; PIPERIDINES; PROPOFOL;

EID: 29144507778     PISSN: 05440440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. KATZ J, FELDMAN MA, BASS EB, LUBOMSKI LH, TIELSCH JM, PETTY BG, FLEISHER LA AND SCHEIN OD: Adverse intraoperative medical events and their association with anesthesia management strategies in cataract surgery. Ophthalmology; 10:1721-6, 2001.
2. HOLAS A, KRAFFT P, MARCOVIC M, QUEHENBERGER F: Remifentanil, propofol or both conscious sedation during eye surgery under regional anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesth; 16:741-8, 1999.
3. SCHAFER R, KLEIT J, AUFFARTH G, POLARZ H, VÖLCKER HE, MARTIN E AND BÖTTIGER BW: Intraocular pressure more reduced during anesthesia with propofol than with sevoflurane: both combined with remifentanil. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 46:703-6, 2002.
4. REWARI V, MADAN R, KAUL HL, KUMAR L: Remifentanil and propofol sedation for retrobulbar nerve block. Anaesth Intensive Care; 30:433-7, 2002.
5. STRACHAN AN, EDWARDS ND: Randomized placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of remifentanil and propofol on bispectral index and sedation. Br J Anaesth; 84:489-90, 2000.
6. GALINDO A: Peri-retrobulbar anesthesia, a special technique and neddle design. In: Gills JP, Hustead RF, eds. Ophthalmic Anesthesia. SALACK Inc; New York, 125-7, 1993.
7. GLANTZ L, DRANGER B, GOZAL Y: Perioperative myocardial ischemia in cataract surgery patients: general versus local anesthesia. Anesth Analg; 91:1415-19, 2000.
8. AHMAD S, LEAVELL ME, FRAGEN RJ, JENKINS W, ROLAND CL: Remifentanil versus alfentanil as analgesic adjuncts during placement of ophthalmologic nerve blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med; 24:331-6, 1999.
9. EGAN TD, LEMMENS HJM, FP, HERMANN DJ, MUIR KT, STANSKI DR, SHAFER SL: The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology; 79:881-892, 1993.
10. MINTO CF, SCHNIDER TW, EGAN TD, YOUNGS E, LEMMENS HJM, GAMBUS PL, BILLARD V, HOKE JF, MOORE KHP, HERMANN DJ, MUIR KT, MANDEMA JW AND SHAFER SL: Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesthesiology; 86:10-23, 1997.
11. BOEZAART AP, BERRY RA, VAN DYK AL: A comparison of propofol and remifentanil for sedation and limitation of movement during peribulbar block. J Clin Anesth; 13:421-6, 2001.
12. FREY K, SUKHANI R, PAWLOWSKI J, PAPPAS AL, MIKAT-STEVENS M, SLOGOFF S: Propofol versus propofol-ketamine sedation for retrobulbar nerve block: comparison of sedation quality, intraocular pressure changes, and recovery profiles. Anesth Analg; 89:317-1, 1999.
13. MINGUS ML, MONK TG, GOLD MI, JENKINS W, ROLAND C: Remifentanil versus propofol as adjuncts to regional anesthesia. J Clin Anesth; 10:46-3, 1998.