Analysis of key comparison data: Unstable travelling standards

Measurement Techniques

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 883-893

  Elster, C ^a   Woger, W ^a   Cox, M ^b  

^a PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Key comparison; Least squares; Random walk; Tability

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144501214     PISSN: 05431972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11018-005-0239-1     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. "Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes," in: Technical Report, International Committee for Weights and Measures (1999).
2. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 2nd ed., Geneva, International Organization for Standardization (1995).
3. M. G. Cox, "The evaluation of key comparison data," Metrolog., 39, 589-595 (2002).
4. M. Désenfant, "Drift problems with the circulated standard during comparisons," in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Analysis of Key Comparisons, D. Richter, W. Wöger, and W. Haesselbarth (eds.), PTB Bericht IT-10, 55-62 (2003).
5. L. Nielsen, "Evaluation of the calibration history of a measurement standard," in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Analysis of Key Comparisons, D. Richter, W. Wöger, and W. Haesselbarth (eds.), PTB Bericht IT-10, 135-140 (2003).
6. R. B. Frenkel, "Comparison of artefact standards by more than two laboratories," Metrolog., 39, 21-29 (2002).
7. K. Weise and W. Wöger, "Removing model and data nonconformity in measurement evaluation," Meas. Sci. Technol., 11, 1649-1658 (2000).