IMPROVEMENT OF ELECTROLARYNGEAL SPEECH BY INTRODUCING NORMAL EXCITATION INFORMATION

6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 323-326

  Ma, Kun ^a   Demirel, Pelin ^a   Espy Wilson, Carol ^a   MacAuslan, Joel ^b  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b Speech Technology and Applied Research Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

cepstral analysis; electrolaryngeal speech; prosody; speech enhancement

Indexed keywords

SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

ARTIFICIAL LARYNX; CEPSTRAL ANALYSIS; CONSTANT FREQUENCY; ELECTROLARYNGEAL SPEECH; EXCITATION SIGNALS; F0 CONTOURS; FREQUENCY RATE; PROSODY; TRANSCUTANEOUS; VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS;

SPEECH ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 29144501146     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. S. Eady (1982), “Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: Tone language versus stress language," Lang. & Speech, 25, 29-42.
2. C. Y. Espy-Wilson, V. Chari, J. MacAuslan, C. Huang, and M. Walsh (1998), Enhancement of Electrolaryngeal Speech by Adaptive Filtering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41, 1253-64.
3. G. Fant (1960), Acoustic Theory of Speech Production, the Hague, Netherlands: Mouto & Co.
4. G. Fairbanks (1960), Voice and Articulation Drillbook. New York: Harper and Row.
5. A. V. Oppenheim (1969), Speech Analysis-Synthesis Based on Homomorphic Filtering. J. Acoust. Soc. of Amer. 45, 458-65.