Intraspecific and interspecific larval interaction in Drosophila assessed by integrated fitness measure

Oikos

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 574-581

  Takahashi, Kazuo H ^a   Kimura, Masahito T ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; LARVA; POPULATION DENSITY;

DROSOPHILA IMMIGRANS; DROSOPHILA RUFA; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; DROSOPHILA SUZUKII;

EID: 29144484686     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.14204.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Atkinson, W. D. 1979. A field investigation of larval competition in domestic Drosophila. - J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 91-102.
2. Bakker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. - Arch. Neerl. Zool. 14: 200-281.
3. Barker, J. S. F. 1983. Interspecific competition. In: Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L. and Thompson, J. N. (eds). The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, pp. 285-341.
4. Beaver, R. A. 1977. Non-equilibrium 'island' communities: Diptera breedins in dead snails. - J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 783-798.
5. Billick, I. and Case, T. J. 1994. Higher order interactions in ecological communities: what are they and how can they be detected? - Ecology 75: 1529-1543.
6. Fanara, J., Mensch, J., Folguera, G. et al. 2004. Developmental time and thorax length differences between the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae reared in different natural hosts. - Evol. Ecol. 18: 203-214.
7. Friberg, U. and Arnqvist, G. 2003. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females. - J. Evol. Biol. 16: 797-811.
8. Heed, W. B. 1968. Ecology of Hawaiian Drosophilidae. - Univ. of Texas Publ. 6818, pp. 387-419.
9. Hodges, S., Mitchell, P. and Arthur, W. 1999. Factors affecting the occurrence of facilitative effects in interspecific interactions: an experiment using two species of Drosophila and Aspergillus niger. - Oikos 87: 166-174.
10. Hoffmeister, T. S. and Rohlfs, M. 2001. Aggregative egg distributions may promote species co-existence-but why do they exist? - Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 37-50.
11. Jaenike, J. and James, A. C. 1991. Aggregation and the coexistence of mycophagous Drosophila. - J. Anim. Ecol. 60: 913-928.
12. Jones, T. H., Langefors, Å., Bonsall, M. B. et al. 1996. Contest competition in Drosophila subobscura. - Res. Popul. Ecol. 38: 105-110.
13. Joshi, A. and Mueller, L. D. 1996. Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: tradeoffs between larval food acquisition and utilization. - Evol. Ecol. 10: 463-474.
14. Krijger, C. L., Peters, Y. C. and Sevenster, J. G. 2001. Competitive ability of neotropical Drosophila predicted from larval development times. - Oikos 92: 325-332.
15. Kojima, K. and Kimura, M. T. 2003. Life history adaptations and stress tolerance of four domestic species of Drosophila. - Entomol. Sci. 63: 135-142.
16. Laska, M. S. and Wootton, T. 1998. Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength. - Ecology 792: 461-476.
17. Lawler, S. P. 1993. Direct and indirect effects in microcosm communities of protists. - Oecologia 93: 184-190.
18. Miller, R. S. 1964. Larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. - Ecology 45: 132-148.
19. Mitsui, H. and Kimura, M. T. 2000. Coexistence of drosophilid flies: aggregation, patch size diversity and parasitism. - Ecol. Res. 15: 93-100.
20. Orengo, D. J. and Prevosti, A. 1994. Preadult competition between Drosophila subobscura and Drosophila pseudoobscura. - Z. Zool. Syst. Evol. -forsch 32: 44-50.
21. Osenberg, C. W., Sarnelle, O. and Cooper, S. D. 1997. Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis. - Am. Nat. 150: 798-812.
22. Paine, R. T. 1992. Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength. - Nature 355: 73-75.
23. Pascual, M., Serra, L. and Ayala, F. 1998. Interspecific laboratory competition of the recently sympatric species Drosophila subobscura and Drosophila pseudoobscura. - Evolution 52: 269-274.
24. Pascual, M., Sagarra, E. and Serra, L. 2000. Interspecific competition in the laboratory between Drosophila subobscura and D. azteca. - Am. Midl. Nat. 144: 19-27.
25. Rohlfs, M. and Hoffmeister, T. S. 2003. An evolutionary explanation of the aggregation model of species coexistence. - Proc. R. Soc. B Suppl. 270: S33-S35.
26. Rohlfs, M. and Hoffmeister, T. S. 2004. Spatial aggregation across ephemeral patches in insect communities: an adaptive response to natural enemies? - Oecologia 140: 651-661.
27. Shorrocks, B. and Bingley, M. 1994. Priority effects and species coexistence: experiments with fungal-breeding Drosophila. - J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 799-806.
28. Shorrocks, B., Atkinson, W. and Charlesworth, P. 1979. Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource. - J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 899-908.
29. Takahashi, K. H., Tuno, N. and Kagaya, T. 2005. The relative importance of spatial aggregation and resource partitioning on the coexistence of mycophagous insects. - Oikos 109:125-134.
30. Toda, M. J., Kimura, M. T. and Tuno, N. 1999. Coexistence mechanisms of mycophagous drosophilids on multispecies fungal hosts: aggregation and resource partitioning. - J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 794-803.
31. Wertheim, B., Sevenster, J. G., Eijs, I. E. M. et al. 2000. Species diversity in a mycophagous insect community: the case of spatial aggregation vs. resource partitoning. - J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 335-351.
32. Wertheim, B., Marchais, J., Vet, L. E. M. et al. 2002. Allee effect in larval resource exploitation in Drosophila: an interaction among density of adults, larvae, and micro-organisms. - Ecol. Entomol. 27: 608-617.
33. Wootton, J. T. 1994. Putting the pieces together: testing the independence of interactions among organisms. - Ecology 75: 1544-1551.
34. Wootton, J. T. 1997. Estimates and tests of per capita interaction strength: diet, abundance, and impact of intertidally foraging birds. - Ecol. Monogr. 67: 45-64.
35. Worthen, W. B., Hipp, M. N., Twardokus, C. T. et al. 1993. Effects of ant predation and larval density on mycophagous fly communities. - Oikos 66: 526-532.