Effect of word familiarity of visually evoked magnetic fields

Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 2004, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Harada, Nobuyoshi ^a,b   Iwaki, S ^a   Nakagawa, S ^a   Yamaguchi, M ^a   Tonoike, M ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Familiarity; IPS; Language; MEG; Pop Out; RMS; VEF

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 29144480523     PISSN: 15268748     EISSN: 15268748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Amano S, Kondo T, Kakehi K. Modality dependency of familiarity rating of Japanese words. Percept Psychophys 1995;57(5):598-603.
2. Amano S, Kondo T. NTT database series, "Nihongo-no goitokusei: lexical properties of Japanese", Vol.1, -Word Familiarity-. Sanseido, Tokyo; 1999.
3. Connine CM, Mullennix J, Shernoff E, Yele J. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1990;16:1084-1096.
4. Landis T, Lehmann D, Mita T, Skrandies W. Evoked potential correlates of figure and ground. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1984;(1):345-8.
5. Matsuo K, Kato C, Ozawa F, Takehara Y, Isoda H, Isogai S, Moriya T, Sakahara H, Okada T, Nakai T. Ideographic characters call for extra processing to correspond with phonemes. Neuroreport 2001;12(10):2227-30.
6. Reicher GM. Perceptual recognition as function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psycology 1969;81:275-80
7. Roeltgen DP, Heilman KM. Lexical agraphia: Further support for two-system hypothesis of linguistic Agraphia. Brain 1984;107:811-27.
8. Sakamoto S, Suzuki Y, Amano S, Kondo T. New list for word intelligibility test with the controlled word familiarities and phonetic balance. The record of electrical and communication engineering. Conversazione Tohoku University 2000;69(2):596-610,
9. Wheeler DD. Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1970;1:59-86