The new dissemination of knowledge: Digital libraries and institutional roles in scholarly publishing

Journal of Economic Methodology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 275-288

  Owen, John MacKenzie ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Publishing knowledge dissemination

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144472269     PISSN: 1350178X     EISSN: 14699427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1350178022000015113     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alexander, A. and Goodyear, M. (2000) 'Changing the role of research libraries in scholarly communication', Journal of Electronic Publishing 5(3) (www.press.umich.edu/jep/05-03/alexander.html).
2. Arms, W.Y. (1999) Digital libraries, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
3. Branin, J.J. and Case, M. (1998) 'Reforming scholarly publishing in the sciences: a librarian perspective', Notices of the AMS April 1998 (http://www.ams.org/notices/199804/branin.pdf).
4. Chen, H. (ed.) (2000) 'Digital libraries', Special topic issue of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(3/4).
5. Chien, Y.T. (1997) 'Digital libraries, knowledge networks, and human-centered information systems', in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Research, Development and Practice in Digital Libraries, ISDL'97, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, November 18-21 (www.dl.ulis.ac.jp/ISDL97/proceedings/ytchien/ytchien.html).
6. Fox, E.A. (ed.) (1999) 'The digital libraries initiative: update and discussion', Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science Special section 26(1): 7-27.
7. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge, London: Sage Publications.
8. Ginsparg, P., Luce, R. and Sompel, H. van de (1999) The UPS Initiative aimed at the Further Promotion of Author Self-archived Solutions, Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Laboratory (http://www.openarchives.org/ups-invitation-ori.htm).
9. Harnad, S. (1999) Learned Enquiry and the Met: The Role of Peer Review, Peer Commentary and Copyright (http://interarch.york.ac.uk/intarch/antiquity/electronics/harnad.html).
10. Kaufman, P. (1998) 'Structure and crisis: markets and market segmentation in scholarly publishing', in Brian L. Hawkins and Patricia Battin (eds) The Mirage of Continuity: Reconfiguring Academic Information Resources for the 21st Century, Washington, D.C.: CLIR & AAU, pp. 178-92.
11. King, D.W. and Tenopir, C. (1998) 'Economic cost models of scientific scholarly journals', paper presented to die ICSU Press workshop, Oxford, 31 March to 2 April 1998 (www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/icsu/kingppr.htm).
12. Kling, R. and McGim, G. (1999) 'Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing', Journal of the American Society for Information science 50(10): 890-906.
13. Mackenzie Owen, J.S. (1996) 'Preservation of digital materials for libraries', LIBER Quarterly 6(4): 435-51.
14. Mackenzie Owen, J.S. and Halm, J. van (1989) Innovation in the Information Chain: the Effects of Technological Development on the Provision of Scientific and Technical Information, London: Routledge.
15. Meadows, A.J. (ed.) (1991) Knowledge and Communication: Essays on the Information Chain, London: Library Association Publishing.
16. Mobley, E.E. (1998) 'Ruminations on the sci-tech serials crisis', Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Fall (www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/98-fall/article4.html).
17. National Science Foundation (2000) National Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Education Digital Library - Program solicitation (NSF 00-44), Arlington: NSF. (http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub7nsf0044).
18. Nature (2000) Future E-access to the Primary Literature Nature Web-debate (www.nature.com.nature/debates/e-access/index.html).
19. Pestre, D. (1997) 'La production des savoirs entre academies et marche: une relecture historique du livre "The new production of knowledge" édité par M. Gibbons', Revue d'Economie industrielle, 97: 163-74.
20. Phelps, Th. A. (1998) 'Multivalent documents: anytime, anywhere, any type, every way user-improvable digital documents and systems', Ph.D. dissertation, University of Berkeley (www.cs.berkeley.edu/phelps/papers/dissertation- abstract.html).
21. Pinfield, S., Eaton, J., Edwards, C., Russell, R., Wissenburg, A. and Wynne, P. (1998) 'Realizing the Hybrid Library', D-Lib Magazine, October 1998 (http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october98/10pinfield.html).
22. Roberts, R.J. (1999) 'Scholarly publishing, peer review and the Internet', First Monday, April 1999 (www.firstmonday.dk/issue4_4/proberts/).
23. Science (2001) 'Science's response: is a government archive the best option?', Science, 5512(291): 2318 (www.sciencemag.org/cgi/contenVfull/291/5512/2318b).
24. Schulenburger (1998) Scholarly Communication and the Need for Collective Action: a Statement by the Chief Academic Officers of the Big 12. (www.bigl2plus.org/pressreleases/scholar.html).
25. Tapscott, D. (1998) Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Whitley, R. (2000) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Wilensky, R. (2000) 'Digital library resources as a basis for collaborative work', Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(3): 228-245.