Causality and Virtual Reality Art

Creativity and Cognition Proceedings 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 4-12

  Cavazza, Marc ^a   Lugrin, Jean Luc ^a   Crooks, Sean ^a   Nandi, Alok ^b   Palmer, Mark ^c   Renard, Marc Le ^d  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Commediastra ^*  (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d CLARTE   (France)

Author keywords

Causality; Digital Arts; Intelligent Virtual environments

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INSTALLATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SPACE APPLICATIONS;

CASUALITY; DIGITAL ARTS; INTELLIGENT VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 29144464897     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1056224.1056228     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Buehner, M.J. and May, J. Rethinking Temporal Contiguity and the Judgment of Causality: Effects of Prior Knowledge, Experience, and Reinforcement Procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A(5) (2003), 865-890.
2. Cavazza, M., Lugrin, J-L., Hartley, S., Libardi, P., Barnes, M.J., Le Bras, M., Le Renard, M., Bec, L. and Nandi, A. New Ways of Worldmaking: the Alterne Platform for VR Art. ACM Multimedia 2004, New York, USA (in Press).
3. Fikes, R. E. and Nilsson, N. J. STRIPS: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 2 (3-4), (1971). 189-208.
4. Grau, O. Virtual Art: from Illusion to Immersion. MIT Press (2003).
5. Haggard, P., Clark, S. and Kalogeras, J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature, 5 (2002), 382-285.
6. Jacobson, J. and Hwang, Z. 2002. Unreal Tournament for Immersive Interactive Theater. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, 1(2002), 39-42.
7. Jiang, H., Kessler, G.D and Nonnemaker, J. DEMIS: a Dynamic Event Model for Interactive Systems. ACM Virtual Reality Software Technology (2002).
8. Kruschke, J. K. and Fragassi, M. M. The perception of causality: Feature binding in interacting objects. Proc. of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1996), 441-446. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Lewis, M. and Jacobson. Games Engines in Scientific Research. Communications of ACM, Vol. 45(2002), n. 1, 27-31.
10. Michotte, A. The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books. Translated from the French by T. R. and E. Miles, (1963).
11. Oestermeier, U. and Hesse, F. W. Singular and general causal arguments. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.). Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2001), 720-725. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Sato, M. and Makiura, N. Amplitude of Chance: the Horizon of Occurrences, Kinyosya Printing Co., Kawasaki, Japan, (2001).
13. Schlottman, A. Shanks D.R. Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44(1992), 321-342.
14. Schlottman, A. Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: How children understand the relation between perceptual causality and knowledge of underlying mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 35 (1999), 503-517.
15. Scholl, B. J. and Tremoulet, P. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(8) (2000), 299-309.
16. Scholl, B.J. and Nakayama, K. Causal Capture: Contextual Effects on the Perception of Collision Events. Psychological Science, vol. 13 (2002), n.6, 493-498.
17. Scholl, B.J. and Nakayama, K. Illusory Causal Crescents: Misperceived spatial relations due to perceived causality. Perception, volume 33 (2004), number 4, 455-469.
18. Sommerer, C. and Mignonneau, L. (Eds.). Art @ Science, New York: Springer Verlag, (1998).
19. Wilkins, D. E. Causal reasoning in planning. Computational Intelligence, vol. 4 (1988), no. 4, 373-380.