메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1505-1510

The criteria and analysis of good multiple choice questions in a health professional setting

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 29144460140     PISSN: 03795284     EISSN: 03795284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (21)

References (11)
  • 2
    • 29144508105 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. Edinburgh, London, New York Philadelphia, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Churchill Livingstone
    • Hart I. Objective clinical examinations. In: Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. Edinburgh, London, New York Philadelphia, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Churchill Livingstone; 2001.
    • (2001) Objective Clinical Examinations
    • Hart, I.1
  • 3
    • 29144481395 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choosing assessment instruments
    • Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. Edinburgh, London, New York Philadelphia, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Churchill Livingstone
    • McAleer S. Choosing assessment instruments. In: Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. Edinburgh, London, New York Philadelphia, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Churchill Livingstone; 2001.
    • (2001) A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers
    • McAleer, S.1
  • 7
    • 0037460838 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ABC of Learning and Teaching in medicine, Written Assessment
    • Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. ABC of Learning and Teaching in medicine, Written Assessment. BMJ 2003; 326: 643-645.
    • (2003) BMJ , vol.326 , pp. 643-645
    • Schuwirth, L.W.1    Van der Vleuten, C.P.2
  • 8
    • 0346656581 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing the teaching instinct 10: Assessment
    • McAleer S, Hesketh EA. Developing the teaching instinct 10: Assessment. Med Teach 2003; 25: 585-588.
    • (2003) Med. Teach. , vol.25 , pp. 585-588
    • McAleer, S.1    Hesketh, E.A.2
  • 9
    • 4544290592 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Different written assessment methods: What can be said about their strengths and weaknesses?
    • Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Med Edu 2004; 38: 974-979.
    • (2004) Med. Edu. , vol.38 , pp. 974-979
    • Schuwirth, L.W.1    Van der Vleuten, C.P.2
  • 11
    • 0032707856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Brief problem-solving questions in medical school examinations: Is it necessary for students to explain their answers?
    • Schwartz PL, Loten EG. Brief problem-solving questions in medical school examinations: Is it necessary for students to explain their answers? Med Edu 1999; 33: 823-827.
    • (1999) Med. Edu. , vol.33 , pp. 823-827
    • Schwartz, P.L.1    Loten, E.G.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.