A framework for classifying and evaluating process architecture methods

Software Process Improvement and Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 415-425

  Green, Stewart ^a   Ould, Martyn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b Venice Consulting Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classification and evaluation framework; Process architecture

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PROCESS CONTROL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CLASSIFICATION AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; PIECEMEAL IDENTIFICATION; PROCESS ARCHITECTURE;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 29144451997     PISSN: 10774866     EISSN: 10991670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/spip.244     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Allen P, Frost S. 1998. Component-Based Development for Enterprise Systems: Applying the Select Perspective. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
2. Beer S. 1981. The Brain of the Firm. Wiley. UK.
3. Harmon P. 2003. Business Process Change. Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, USA.
4. Kavakli V, Loucopoulos P. 1999. Goal-driven business process analysis application in electricity deregulation.Information Systems 4(3): 187-207.
5. Loucopoulos P, Kavakli V, Prekas N, Rolland C. 1997. Using the EKD Approach: The Modelling Component, Research Report (ELEKTRA project), ELEKTRA/WP2/T2.1/UMIST/3, UMIST: Manchester, NH.
6. Lunn K. 2003. Software Development with UML. Palgrave Macmillan: UK.
7. Lunn K, Sixsmith A, Lindsay A, Vaarama M. 2003. Traceability in requirements through process modelling, Applied to Social Care Applications, Information and Software Technology. Special Edition on Business Process Modelling 45(15): 1045-1052.
8. Ould M. 1997. Designing a re-engineering proof process architecture. Business Process Management Journal 3(3): 232-247.
9. Ould M. 2000. Basing an information systems strategy on the organization's process architecture. In Process Think: Winning Perspectives for Business Change in the Information Age,Grover V(ed.). Idea Group Publishing: 209-226.
10. Ould M. 2005. Business Process Management: A Rigorous Approach. British Computer Society: UK.
11. Rolland C, Ben Achour C, Cauvet C, Ralyte J, Sutcliffe A, Maiden N, Jarke P, Pohl K, Heymans P. 1998. A proposal for a scenario classification framework. Requirements Engineering 3: 23-47.
12. Snowdon R, Kawalek P. 2003. Active meta-process models: a conceptual exposition, Information and Software Technology. Special Edition on Business Process Modelling 45(15): 1021-1029.