Limited resources - Growing needs: Lessons learned in a process to facilitate program evaluation

Journal of Extension

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 33-45

  Aguilar, Cristobal ^a   Thornsbury, Suzanne ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144442478     PISSN: 10775315     EISSN: 10775315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Aguilar, C., & Thornsbury, S. (2003a). Michigan apple committee winter 2003 grower survey: Summary of results. Agricultural Economics Report 618, Michigan State University.
2. Aguilar, C., & Thornsbury, S. (2003b). Michigan apple committee winter 2003 grower survey: Research programs. Agricultural Economics Report 619, Michigan State University.
3. Alkin, M. C. (1990). Debates on evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402.
5. Brennan, M. (1992). Techniques for improving mail survey response rates. Marketing Bulletin, 3, 24-37, Article 4.
6. Cochran, W. G. (1963). Sampling techniques. Second Edition. Wiley and Sons, New York.
7. Decker, D. J., & Yerka, B. L. (1990). Organizational philosophy for program evaluation. Journal of Extension [On-line], 28(2). Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/1990summer/f1.html
8. Diem, K. (1999). Choosing appropriate research methods to evaluate educational programs. Rutgers Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet #FS943. New Brunswick, NJ
9. Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. Second Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Douglah, M. (1998). Developing a concept of Extension program evaluation. Program Development and Evaluation, Series G3658-7. University of Wisconsin-Extension.
11. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Israel, G. D.
12. (1992). Sampling the evidence of Extension program impact. Fact Sheet PEOD-5, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
13. O'Neill, B. (1998). Money talks: Documenting the economic impact of extension personal finance programs. Journal of Extension [On-line], 36(5). Available at: http://www.joe.org/ joe/1998october/a2.html
14. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Rosey, D. (1992). Program evaluation. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publisher.
16. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In Stake R.E. (Ed.), Curriculum evaluation. American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Evaluation, No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally.
17. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Stupp, R. (2003). Program evaluation: Use it to demonstrate value to potential clients. Journal of Extension [On-line], 41(4). Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/2003auqust/comml.shtml
19. Summerhill, W. R., & Taylor, C. L. (1992). Selecting a data collection technique. Circular PE-21, Program Evaluation and Organizational Development, Florida Cooperative Extension Service.
20. Taylor-Powell, E., Steele, S., & Douglah, M. (1996). Planning a program evaluation. Program Development and Evaluation, Series G3658-1. University of Wisconsin-Extension.