Performance comparison of MPI and OpenMP on shared memory multiprocessors

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 29-61

  Krawezik, Géraud ^a   Cappello, Franck ^a  

^a UFR 919 Laboratoire d'Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur   (France)

Author keywords

MPI; OpenMP; Performance evaluation; Shared memory multiprocessors

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT;

MPI; OPENMP; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PORTABLE PROGRAMMING MODEL; SHARED MEMORY MULTIPROCESSOR;

MULTIPROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 29144437214     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.905     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cappello F, Etiemble D. MPI versus MPI+OpenMP on IBM SP for the NAS Benchmarks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Supercomputing 2000: High-Performance Networking and Computing (SC2000), Dallas, TX, 2000. Available at: http://www.sc2000.org/proceedings/techpapr/index.htm.
2. Kloos P, Mathey F, Blaise P. OpenMP and MPI programming with a CG algorithm. Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on OpenMP (EWOMP 2000), Edinburgh, U.K., 2000, Bull M, Chapman BM (eds.). Available at: http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/ewomp2000/proceedings.html.
3. Kneer A. Industrial mixed OpenMP/MPI CFD application for practical use in free-surface flow calculations. Proceedings of the International Workshop on OpenMP Applications and Tools (WOMPAT 2000), San Diego, CA, 2000, Chapman BM (ed.).
4. Smith L, Bull M. Development of mixed mode MPI/OpenMP applications. Scientific Programming 2001; 9(2-3):83-98.
5. Snir M, Otto S, Huss-Lederman S, Walker D, Dongarra J. MPI: The Complete Reference. Massachussets Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, 1996. Available at: http://www.netlib.org/utk/papers/mpi-book/mpi-book.html.
6. Chandra R, Menon R, Dagum L, Kohr D, Maydan D, McDonald J. Parallel Programming in OpenMP. Morgan Kaufman: San Mateo, CA, 2000.
7. Bailey D, Harris T, Saphir W, van der Wijngaart R, Woo A, Yarrow M. The NAS Parallel Benchmarks 2.0. Report NAS-95-020, Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Facility, NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop T 27 A-1, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, U.S.A., December 1995. Available at: http://www.nas.nasa.gov/NAS/NPB/Specs/npb2.0.html.
8. Wong FC, Martin RP, Arpaci-Dusseau R, Culler DE. Architectural requirements and scalability of the NAS parallel benchmarks. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Supercomputing 1999: High-Performance Networking and Computing (SC99), Portland, OR, 1999.
9. Huse LP, Bugge HO. High-end computing on SHV workstations connected with high performance network. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Applied Parallel Computing (PARA2000) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1947), Bergen, Norway, Gebremedhin AH, Manne F, Moe R, Sørevik T (eds.). Springer: Berlin, 2000; 324-332.
10. Chapman BM, Patil A, Prabhakar A. Performance oriented programming for NUMA architectures. Proceedings of the International Workshop on OpenMP Applications and Tools (WOMPAT 2001) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2104), West Lafayette, Voss MJ, Eigenmann R (eds.). Springer: Berlin, 2001; 137-154.
11. Jin H, Frumkin MA, Yan J. The OpenMP implementation of the NAS parallel benchmarks and its performance. Technical Report, Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Facility, NASA Ames Research Center, October 1999. Available at: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/408248.html.
12. Ayguadé E, et al. NANOS: Effective integration of fine-grain parallelism exploitation and multiprogramming. Technical Report, Technical University of Catalunya, Computer Architecture Department, 1999. Available at: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/487677.html.
13. Tanaka Y, Taura K, Sato M, Yonezawa A. Performance evaluation of OpenMP applications with nested parallelism. Languages, Compilers, and Run-Time Systems for Scalable Computers (LCR'00) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1915), Rochester, Dwarkadas S (ed.). Springer: Berlin, 2000; 100-112. Available at: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/415618.html.
14. Armstrong B, Kim SW, Eigenmann R. Quantifying differences between OpenMP and MPI using a large-scale application suite. Proceedings of the third High Performance Computing: International Symposium (ISHPC 2000), International Workshop on OpenMP: Experiences and Implementations (WOMPEI 2000) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1940), Tokyo, Japan, Valero M, Joe K, Kitsuregawa M, Tanaka H (eds.). Springer: Berlin, 2000; 274-288.
15. Bane MK, Keller R, Pettipher M, Smith I. A Comparison of MPI and OpenMP implementations of a finite analysis code. Proceedings of the 42nd Cray User Group (CUG-2000), Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2000.
16. Wallcraft AJ. SPMD OpenMP vs MPI for ocean models. Concurrency - Practice and Experience 2000; 12(12):1155-1164.