Heat and power integration of methane reforming based hydrogen production

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 44, Issue 24, 2005, Pages 9113-9119

  Posada, Alberto ^a   Manousiouthakis, Vasilios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEAT INTEGRATION; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION PLANTS; METHANE REFORMING; POWER INTEGRATION;

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; HEAT ENGINES; HEAT EXCHANGERS; HYDROGEN; METHANE;

REFORMING REACTIONS;

HYDROGEN;

EID: 29144436308     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie049041k     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. National Research Council. The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Cost, Barriers, and R&D Needs; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2004.
2. Scholz, W. H. Process for Industrial Production of Hydrogen and Associated Environmental Effects. Gas Sep. Purif. 1993, 7, 131.
3. Spath, P. L.; Mann, M. K. Life Assessment of Hydrogen Production via Natural Gas Steam Reforming; Technical Report NREL/TP-570-27637; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, 2001.
4. 2. Appl. Catal., A 1999, 176, 159.
5. Tindall, B.; King, D. Designing Steam Reformers for Hydrogen Production: Keep these Important Factors in Mind when Designing, Revamping or Troubleshooting. Hydrocarbon Process. 1994, 73, 69.
6. Shahani, G. H.; Garodz, L. J.; Murphy, K. J.; Baade, W. F.; Sharma, P. Hydrogen and Utility Supply Optimization. Hydrocarbon Process. 1998, 77, 143.
7. Rajesh, J. K.; Gupta, S. K.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Ray, A. K. Multi-Objective Optimization of Steam Reformer Performance using Genetic Algorithm. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 706.
8. Rajesh, J. K.; Gupta, S. K.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Ray, A. K. Multi-Objective Optimization of Industrial Hydrogen Plants. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 999.
9. Leiby, S. M. Options for Refinery Hydrogen; PEP Report No. 212, Process Economics Program; SRI International: Menlo Park, CA, 1994.
10. Hufton, J. R.; Mayorga, S.; Sircar, S. Sorption-Enhanced Reaction Process for Hydrogen Production. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 248.
11. Xu, J.; Froment, G. F. Methane Steam Reforming, Methanation and Water-Gas Shift: I. Intrinsic Kinetics. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 88.
12. Keiski, R. L.; Salmi, T.; Niemisto, P.; Ainassaari, J.; Pohjola, V. J. Stationary and Transient Kinetics of the High-Temperature Water-Gas Shift Reaction. Appl. Catal., A 1996, 137, 349.
13. Rase, H. F. Chemical Reactor Design for Process Plants; Wiley: New York, 1977.
14. Sircar, S. Pressure Swing Adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 1389.
15. Ruthven, D. M.; Farooq, S.; Knaebel, K. S. Pressure Swing Adsorption; Wiley: New York, 1994.
16. AspenTech. http://www.aspentech.com/brochures/HYSYS.pdf (accessed May 2005).
17. AspenTech. http://www.aspentech.com/brochures/applied-_physical_properties.pdf (accessed May 2005).
18. Ogden, J. M. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production; Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton University: Princeton, NJ, 2001.
19. Holiastos, K.; Manousiouthakis, V. Minimum Hot/Cold/ Electric Utility Cost for Heat Exchange Networks. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26, 3.
20. Linnhoff, B. Pinch Analysis-a State-of-the-art Overview. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1993, 71, 503.
21. Stanford Business Software Inc. http://www.sbsi-sol-optimize.com/manuals/ Minos%20Manual.pdf (accessed Sept 2004).
22. Ondrey, G.; Hoffmann, P.; Moore, S. Green Laws Spark Hydrogen Technologies. Chem. Eng. 1992, 99, 30.
23. Linnhoff, B.; Townsend, D. W.; Boland, D.; Hewitt, G. F.; Thomas, B. E. A.; Guy, A. R.; Marsiand, R. H. User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy; Institute of Chemical Engineers (England); Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1982.
24. U.S. Department of Energy, http://www.eia.doe.gov (accessed March 2004).
25. Peters, M. S.; Timmerhaus, K. D.; West, R. E. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2003.