Poor agreement between prospective and retrospective assessment of hallux surgery using the AOFAS hallux scale

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1062-1066

  Schneider, Wolfgang ^a,b   Knahr, Karl ^a  

^a 2nd General Orthopedic Department ^*

^b ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL SPEISING   (Austria)

Author keywords

AOFAS Score; Hallux Surgery; Prospective Evaluation; Retroactive Assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOOT SURGERY; HALLUX; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 29044443843     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107110070502601211     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bland, JM; Altman, DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8476:307-310, 1986.
2. Bland, JM; Altman, DG: Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Meth. Med. Res. 8:135-160, 1999.
3. Button, G; Pinney, S: A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: Is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int. 25:521-525, 2004.
4. Kitaoka, HB; Alexander, IJ; Adelaar, RS; et al.: Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle 15:349-353, 1994.
5. Lingard, EA; Wright, EA; Sledge, CB: Pitfalls of using patient recall to derive preoperative status in outcome studies of total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. 83-A:1149-1156, 2001.
6. Toolan, B; Wright Quinones, V; Cunningham, B; Brage, M: An evaluation of the use of retrospectively acquired preoperative AOFAS clinical rating scores to assess surgical outcome after elective foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 22:775-778, 2001.