Electronic nose chemical sensor versus gas chromatography: A feasibility study for the differentiation of apple flavors and essences

Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 2003-2006

  Marrazzo, W N ^a   Heinemann, P H ^a   Saftner, R A ^b   Crassweller, R E ^c   Leblanc, E ^b  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b Syst Botany and Mycology Laboratory   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apple; Electronic nose; Essences; Flavors

Indexed keywords

FLAVORS; FOOD PRODUCTS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; POWER ELECTRONICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

APPLE; ELECTRONIC NOSE; ESSENCE;

CHEMICAL SENSORS;

PRECISION AGRICULTURE;

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 28944449938     PISSN: 00012351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Arthur, C., L. Killam, S. Motlagh, M. Lim, D. Potter, and J. Pawliszyn. 1992. Analysis of substituted benzene compounds in groundwater using solid-phase microextraction. Environ Sci. and Tech. 26(5): 979-983.
2. Dimick, P. S., and J. C. Hoskin. 1983. Review of apple flavor - State of the art. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 18(4): 387-409.
3. Doleman, B. J., R. D. Sanner, E. J. Severin, R. H. Grubbs, and N. S. Lewis. 1998. Use of compatible polymer blends to fabricate arrays of carbon black-polymer composite vapor detectors. Anal. Chem. 70(13): 2560-2564.
4. Heiden, A. C., C. Gil, and L. S. Ramos. 2002. Rapid screening of headspace samples: Pros and cons of using MS-based electronic noses versus fast chromatography. Application note. Mulheim an der Ruhr, Germany: Gerstel GmbH.
5. InfoMetrix. 1999. Electronic nose instrumentation: Comparing odor evaluation technologies. Infometrix application note. Woodinville, Wash.: InfoMetrix, Inc.
6. MacGregor, D. R., H. Sugisawa, and J. S. Matthews. 1964. Apple juice volatiles. J. Food Sci. 29: 448-455.
7. Marrazzo, W. N. 1999. Feasibility study for the utilization of Cyrano Sciences chemical sensor data logger technology for comparing apple, Malus domestica Borkh, headspace gases. PhD diss. University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University.
8. Morton, I. D., and A. J. MacLeod. 1990. Chapter 1: The flavour of apples, pears, and quinces. In Food Flavours: Part C. The Flavour of Fruits, 1-41. Developments in Food Science, vol. 3. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
9. Sarig, Y., and M. Delwiche. 1998. Utilization of the olfactory characteristics of fruits and vegetables as a potential method for determining their ripeness and readiness for harvest: A review. NE-179. Davis, Cal.: University of California at Davis.
10. SAS. 1997. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute, Inc.