The relationship between vertical craniofacial morphology and the sagittal path of mandibular movements

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 857-862

  Farella, M ^a   Iodice, G ^a   Michelotti, A ^a   Leonardi, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Craniofacial morphology; Jaw tracking; Mandibular movements

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MASTICATORY MUSCLE; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MASTICATORY MUSCLES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX FACTORS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 28944439487     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01514.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:109-123.
2. Nanda SK. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces. Am J Orthod. 1990;93:247-258.
3. Schendel SA, Eisenfeld J, Bell WH, Epker BN, Mishelevich DJ. The long face syndrome-vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:398-408.
4. Opdebeeck H, Bell WH. The short face syndrome. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:499-511.
5. Isaacson JR, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM, Worms FW. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:219-229.
6. Ueda HM, Miyamoto K, Saifuddin M, Ishizuka Y, Tanne K. Masticatory muscle activity in children and adults with different facial types. Am J Orthod. 2000;118:63-68.
7. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon WL. Occlusal forces in normal and long face adults. J Dent Res. 1983;62:566-571.
8. Moller E. The chewing apparatus: an electromyographic study of the action of the muscle of mastication and its correlation to facial morphology. Acta Phys Scand. 1966;69(Suppl. 280):1-229.
9. Garcia-Morales P, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, English JD. Maximum bite force, muscle efficiency and mechanical advantage in children with vertical growth patterns. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:265-272.
10. Farella M, Bakke M, Michelotti A, Rapuano A, Martina R. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:183-188.
11. Ingervall B. Variation of the range of movement of the mandible in relation to facial morphology in young adults. J Dent Res. 1971;79:133-140.
12. Muto T, Kanazawa M. The relationship between maximal jaw opening and size of skeleton: a cephalometric study. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:22-24.
13. Dijkstra PU, Hof AL, Stegenga B, de Bont LG. Influence of mandibular length on mouth opening. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:117-122.
14. Fukui T, Tsuruta M, Murata K, Wakimoto Y, Tokiwa H, Kuwahara Y. Correlation between facial morphology, mouth opening ability and condylar movement during opening-closing jaw movement in female adults with normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:327-336.
15. Posselt U. Studies in the mobility of the mandible. Acta Odontol Scand. 1952;10(Suppl.):1-160.
16. Clark GT, Beemsterbeer PL, Rugh JD. Nocturnal masseter muscle activity and the symptoms of masticatory dysfunction. J Oral Rehabil. 1981;8:279-286.
17. Okeson JP. Orofacial pain. Guidelines for assessment, diagnosis and management. Chicago: Quintessence Pub Co.; 1996:88-108.
18. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, Mc Namara JA, Stuart Hunter WL. An atlas of craniofacial growth. Michigan:CHGD; 1974:50.
19. Throckmorton GS, Teenier TJ, Ellis E. III Reproducibility of mandibular motion and muscle activity levels using a commercial computer recording system. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:348-354.
20. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications; 1940.
21. Manns A, Miralles R, Guerrero F. The changes in electrical activity of the postural muscles of the mandible upon varying the vertical dimension. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45:438-445.
22. Majewski RF, Gale EN. Electromyographic activity of anterior temporal area pain patients and non-pain subjects. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1228-1231.
23. Peterson TM, Rugh JD, McIver JE. Mandibular rest position in subjects with high and low mandibular plane angles. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:318-320.
24. Rugh JD, Drago CJ. Vertical dimension: a study of clinical rest position and jaw muscle activity. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45:670-675.
25. Van Sickels JE, Rugh JD, Chu GW, Lemke RR. Electromyographic relaxed mandibular position in long-faced subjects. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:578-581.
26. Wessberg GA, Washburn MC, Epker BN, Dana KO. Evaluation of mandibular rest position in subjects with diverse dentofacial morphology. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:451-460.
27. Hunt NP, Cunningham SJ. The use of kinesiography to assess mandibular rest positions following corrective orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26:179-184.
28. Salaorni C, Palla S. Condylar rotation and anterior translation in healthy human temporomandibular joints. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1994;104:415-422.
29. Ingervall B. Relation between height of the articular tubercle of the temporomandibular joint and facial morphology. Angle Orthod. 1974;44:15-24.
30. Kantomaa T. The relation between mandibular configuration and the shape of the glenoid fossa in the human. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:77-81.
31. Baccetti T, Antonini A, Franchi L, Tonti M, Tollaro I. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study. Br J Orthod. 1997;24:55-59.
32. Osborn JW. Relationship between the mandibular condyle and the occlusal plane during hominid evolution: some of its effects on jaw mechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987;73:193-207.