Comparison of Eddy Covariance and BREB methods in determining forest evapotranspiration - Case study on broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain

Chinese Journal of Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1245-1249

  Wu, Jiabing ^a,b   Guan, Dexing ^a   Zhang, Mi ^a   Han, Shijie ^a   Jin, Changjie ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF APPLIED ECOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Bowen Ratio; Eddy Covariance method; Evapotranspiration

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDDY COVARIANCE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION;

ASIA; CHANGBAI MOUNTAINS; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JILIN;

PINUS KORAIENSIS;

EID: 28844505135     PISSN: 10004890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chinese source. 2005. [J]. 24(1):88-96.
2. Chinese source. 2004. [J]. 34:15-29.
3. Chinese source. 1985. [M]. 196-205.
4. Chinese source. 2001. [J]. 12(6):933-937.
5. Chinese source. 1980. [J]. 1:58-61.
6. Chinese source. 1997. [J]. 33(4):522-528.
7. Chinese source. 1993. [J]. 8(1):85-96.
8. 2 [J]. 34:95-102.
9. Chinese source. 1988. [J]. 1:22-27.
10. Chinese source. 1980. [J]. 1:24-33.
11. Chinese source. 1989. [J]. 2(1):34-41.
12. Chinese source. 2003. [J]. 14(5):617-621.
13. Chinese source. 1999. [J]. 21(3):85-91.
14. Angus DE, Watts PJ. 1984. Evapotranspiration-How good is the Bowen ration method[J]. Agric. Water. Man.,8:133-150.
15. Fuchs M, Tanner CB. 1970. Error analysis of Bowen rations measured by differential psychrometry[J]. Agric. Meteorol., 7: 329-334.
16. Garratt JR. 1993. Sensitivity of climate simulations to land surface and atmospheric boundary-layer treatments-A review [J]. J. Clim., 6:419-449.
17. Grace J, Lloyd J, McIntyre J. 1995. Fluxes of carbon dioxide and water vapour over an undisturbed tropical forest in southwest Amazonia[J]. Glob. Change Biol., 1:1-12.
18. 2 and water vapour exchange rates over a temperate deciduoud forest[J]. Global. Change Biol., 2:183-197.
19. Kell BW, Paul JH, Patrick JM, et al. 2001. A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, eddy covariance and catchment water balance [J]. Agric. For. Meteorol., 106:153-168.
20. Luis SP, Alain P, Richard GA, et al. 1999. Evapotranspiration: Concepts and future trends [J]. J. Irrig. Drain. Engin., 125 (2):45-51.
21. Malek E, Bingham GE. 1993. Comparison of the Bowen ratio-energy balance and the water balance methods for the measurement of evapotranspiration[J]. J. Hydrol., 146:209-220.
22. Ohmura A. 1982. Objective criteria for rejecting data for Bowen ration flux calculations[J]. J. Appl. Meteorol., 21:595-598.
23. Paw U, Baldocchi KT, Meyers DD. 2000. Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxes[J]. Boundary - Layer Meteorol., 97:487-511.
24. Perez PJ, Castellvi F, Ibanez M, et al. 1999. Assessment of reliability of Bowen ration methods for partitioning fluxes[J]. Agric. For. Meteorol., 97:141-150.
25. Prueger JH, Hatfield JL, Aase JK. 1997. Bowen-ratio comparisons with lysimetric evapotranspiration[J]. Agron. J., 89:730-736.
26. Shuttleworth WJ, Gash JHC, Lloyd CR, et al. 1984. Eddy correlation measurements of energy partition for Amazon forest[J]. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 110:1163-1169.