Lamellar macular hole and continuous vitreofoveal adherence

Harefuah

Volumn 144, Issue 11, 2005, Pages

  Ramirez, Jose A ^a   Karatas, Muge ^a   Fatum, Samia ^a   Halpert, Michael ^b   Ophir, Avinoam ^a,c  

^a HILLEL YAFFE MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^c TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Idiopathic macular hole; Lamellar macular hole; Optical coherence tomography; Partial posterior vitreous detachment; Vitreofoveal adherence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR FOREIGN BODY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA MACULA HOLE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THICKNESS; VITRECTOMY; VITREOUS BODY; VITREOUS BODY DETACHMENT;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETINAL PERFORATIONS; VITREOUS BODY;

EID: 28844491086     PISSN: 00177768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Johnson RN & Gass JD, Idiopathic macular holes. Observations, stages of formation, and implications for surgical intervention. Ophthalmology, 1988; 95: 917-924.
2. Hee M, Puliafito C, Wong C & al, Optical coherence tomography of macular holes. Ophthalmology, 1995; 120: 748-756.
3. Azzolini C, Patelli F & Brancato R, Correlation between optical coherence tomography data and biomicroscopic interpretation of idiopathic macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol, 2001; 132: 348-355.
4. Schachat A & Murphy R, Macular hole. In: Ryan SJ, Schachat AP & Murphy RP, (Eds). Medical Retina, Baltimore, MD: Mosby, 1994; 1173-1175.
5. Gaudric A, Haouchine B, Massin P & al, Macular hole formation: new data provided by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol, 1999; 117: 744-751.
6. Belkacem H, Pascale M & Alain G, Foveal Pseudocyst as the first step in macular hole formation. Ophthalmology, 2001; 108: 15-22.
7. Ripandelli G, Coppe AM, Bonini S & al, Morphological evaluation of full-thickness idiopathic macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Eur J Ophthalmol, 1999; 9: 212-216.
8. Benhamou N, Massin P, Haouchine B & al, Macular retinoschisis in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol, 2002; 133: 794-800.
9. Gass JD, Lamellar macular hole: a complication of cystoid macular edema after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol, 1976; 94: 793-800.
10. Takahahi H & Kishi S, Tomographic features of lamellar macular hole formation and lamellar hole that progressed to a full thickness macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol, 2000; 130: 677-679.
11. Smiddy WE & Flynn HW Jr, Pathogenesis of macular holes and therapeutic implications. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004; 137: 525-537.
12. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP & al, Optical coherence tomography. Science, 1991; 254: 1178-1181.
13. Goebel W & Kretzchmar-Gross T, Retinal thickness in diabetic retinopathy: a study using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Retina, 2002; 22: 759-767.
14. Konno S, Akiba J & Yoshida A, Retinal thickness measurements with optical coherence tomography and the scanning retinal thickness analyser. Retina, 2001; 21: 57-61.
15. Massin P, Erginay A, Haouchine B & al, Retinal thickness in healthy and diabetic subjects measured using optical coherence tomography mapping software. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2002; 12: 102-108.
16. Ramirez JA & Ophir A, Inner lamellar macular holes vs. macular pseudoholes with normal foveal thicknesses. Int J Ophthalmol, 2003; 3: 4-8.
17. Haouchine B, Massin P, Tadayoni R & al, Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004; 138: 732-739.
18. Wilkins JR, Puliafito CA, Hee MR & al, Characterization of epiretinal membranes using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology, 1996; 103: 2142-2151.
19. Cheng L, Freeman W, Ozerdem U & al, Prevalence, correlates, and natural history of epiretinal membranes surrounding idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmology, 2000; 107: 853-859.
20. Uchino E, Uemura A & Ohba N, Initial stages of posterior vitreous detachment in healthy eyes of older persons evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol, 2001; 119: 1475-1479.