Intraoperative consultation, cytologic preparations, and frozen section in the central nervous system

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 129, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1635-1652

  Powell, Suzanne Z ^a,b  

^a HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN BIOPSY; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INFECTION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMOR; CONSULTATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; IMMUNE DEFICIENCY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSURGERY; PATHOLOGIST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; PATHOLOGY, SURGICAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 28844480051     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Yachnis AT. Intraoperative consultation for nervous system lesions. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2002;19(4):192-206.
2. Firlik KS, Martinez AJ, Lunsord LD. Use of cytological preparations for the intraoperative diagnosis of stereotactically obtained brain biopsies: a 19 year experience and survey of neuropathologists. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:454-458.
3. Brainard JA, Prayson RA, Barnett CH. Frozen section evaluation of stereotactic brain biopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:481-484.
4. Burger PC, Nelson JS. Stereotactic brain biopsies: specimen preparation and evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:477-480.
5. Burger PC. Use of cytological preparations in the frozen section diagnosis of central nervous system neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;9:344-354.
6. Folkerth RD. Smears and frozen sections in the intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 1994;5:1-18.
7. Taratulo AL, Sevlever C, Piccardo P. Clues and pitfalls in stereotactic biopsy of the central nervous system. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;115:596-602.
8. Goodman JC. Central nervous system, pituitary gland, and pineal gland. In: Ramzy I, ed. Clinical Cytopathology and Aspiration Biopsy Fundamental Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McCraw-Hill; 2001.
9. Asa SL. Tumors of the Pituitary Cland. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1998.
10. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, 3rd series, fascicle 22.
11. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Vogel FS. Surgical Pathology of the Nervous System and its Coverings. 4th ed. St Louis, Mo: Elsevier Science; 2002.
12. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW. Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1994.
13. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, 3rd series, fascicle 10.
14. Ellison D, Love S, Chimelli L, Harding BN, Lowe J, Vinters HV. Neuropathology: A Reference Text of CNS Pathology. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, UK: Mosby; 2004.
15. Fuller CN, Goodman JC. Practical Review of Neuropathology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
16. Cray F, DeGirolami U, Poirier J. Manual of Basic Neuropathology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Butterworth Heinemann; 2004.
17. Ironside JW, Moss TH, Louis DN, Lowe JS, Weller RO. Diagnostic Pathology of Nervous System Tumours. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2002.
18. Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, eds. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Nervous System. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2000.
19. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours; vol 1.
20. Lloyd RV. Surgical Pathology of the Pituitary Gland. Volume 27 in the Series Major Problems in Pathology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1993.
21. Nelson JS, Mena H, Parisi JE, Schochet SS, eds. Principles and Practice of Neuropathology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
22. Prayson RA, Cohen ML. Practical Differential Diagnosis in Surgical Neuropathology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2000.
23. WHO Infection Control Guidelines for Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies. Available at: http://www.who.int/emc. Report of a WHO Consultation, Geneva, Switzerland, 23-26 March 1999; 1-43. Accessed June 30, 2005.
24. BMBL Section VII: Agent Summary Statements Section VII-D: Prions. Available at the Office of Health and Safety (OHS) of the Centers for Disease Control Web site: http://www.cdc.gov/od/ohs/biosfty/bmbl4/bmbl4s7d.htm.Accessed June 30, 2005.
25. Olasode BJ, Ironside JW. The brain smear, a rapid affordable intraoperative diagnostic technique for brain tumours appropriate for Africa. Trop Doct. 2004;34(4):223-225.
26. Wilson LB. A method for the rapid preparation of fresh tissues for the microscope. JAMA. 1905;45:1737.
27. Brommeland T, Lindal S, Straume B, Dahl IL, Hennig R. Does imprint cytology of brain tumours improve intraoperative diagnoses? Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;108(3):153-156.
28. Sugita Y, Tokunaga O, Morimatsu M, Abe H. Cytodiagnosis of central neurocytoma in intraoperative preparations. Acta Cytol. 2004;48(2):194-198.
29. Hoang MP, Amirkhan RH. Inhibin alpha distinguishes hemangioblastoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(8):1152-1156.
30. Jung SM, Kuo TT. Immunoreactivity of CD10 and inhibin alpha in differentiating hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system from metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(6):78-94.
31. Roy S, Chu A, Trojanowski JQ, Zhang PJ. D2-40, a novel monoclonal antibody against the M2A antigen as a marker to distinguish hemangioblastomas from renal cell carcinomas. Acta Neuropathologica. 2005;109(5):497-502.