Interstudy reproducibility of quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 815-822

  Elkington, Andrew G ^a   Gatehouse, Peter D ^a   Ablitt, Nicholas A ^b   Yang, Guang Zhong ^b   Firmin, David N ^a   Pennell, Dudley J ^a  

^a ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Gadolinium; Heart; MR; Perfussion

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADENOSINE; ADULT; AGED; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REST; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 28844478450     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10976640500287877     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bellenger NG, Davies LC, Francis JM, Coats AJ, Pennell DJ. Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000; 2:271-278.
2. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1445-1453.
3. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, Flamm SD, Plein S, Nagel E, Langerak SE, Weber OM, Pedersen EM, Schmidt M, Bothar RM, Manning WJ. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1863-1869.
4. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Buchi M, Knusel PR, Marincek B, Luscher TF, von Schulthess GK. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001; 103:2230-2235.
5. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, Okinaka T, Isaka N, Nakano T, Takeda K. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 2003; 229:209-216.
6. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, Grothues F, Firmin DN, Collins PD, Pennell DJ. Abnormal heterogeneous myocardial perfusion using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Syndrome-X. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1948-1953.
7. Lauerma K, Virtanen KS, Sipila LM, Hekali P, Aronen HJ. Multislice MRI in assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease before and after revascularization. Circulation 1997; 96:2859-2867.
8. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, Schnackenburg B, Paetsch I, Klein C, Fleck E. Improvement of myocardial perfusion reserve early after coronary intervention: assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:1557-1564.
9. Alazraki NP, Krawczynska EG, DePuey EG, Ziffer JA, Vansant JP, Pettigrew RI, Taylor A, King SB III, Garcia EV. Reproducibility of thallium-201 exercise SPECT studies. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:1237-1244.
10. Mahmarian JJ, Moye LA, Verani MS, Bloom MF, Pratt CM. High reproducibility of myocardial perfusion defects in patients undergoing serial exercise thallium-201 tomography. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75:1116-1119.
11. Nagamachi S, Czernin J, Kim AS, Sun KT, Bottcher M, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Reproducibility of measurements of regional resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow assessed with PET. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:1626-1631.
12. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Yap JT, Rimoldi O, Camici PG. Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET. J Nucl Med 1999; 40:1848-1856.
13. Muhling OM, Dickson ME, Zenovich A, Huang Y, Wilson BV, Wilson RF, Anand IS, Seethamraju RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke NM. Quantitative magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion analysis: inter-and intraobserver agreement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001; 3:247-256.
14. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174:757-762.
15. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, Ellermann J, Ya X, Merkle H, Path G, Ludemann H, Bache RJ, Ugurbil K. Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: correlation between myocardial blood flow at rest and during hyperemia. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29:485-497.
16. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Stillman AE, Kroll K, Tsekos N, Merkle H, Parrish T, Hu X, Wang Y, Bassingthwaite J, et al. Concepts of myocardial perfusion imaging in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1994; 10:249-286.
17. Cullen JH, Horsfield MA, Reek CR, Cherryman GR, Barnett DB, Samani NJ. A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:1986-1994.
18. Keijer JT, van Rossum AC, van Eenige MJ, Karreman AJ, Hofmann MB, Valk J, Visser CA. Semiquantitation of regional myocardial blood flow in normal subjects by first-pass magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1995; 130:893-901.
19. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE, Wilson RF. Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys 1998; 25:73-84.
20. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, Huang Y, Christensen BV, Stillman AE, Ugurbil K, McDonald K, Wilson RF. Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 204:373-384.
21. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000; 101:1379-1383.
22. 1 relaxivity. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 93.
23. Moon JCC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ. Breathhold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 2002; 223:789-797.
24. Marcus ML, Kerber RE, Erhardt JC, Falsetti HL, Davis DM, Abboud FM. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of left ventricular perfusion in awake dogs. Am Heart J 1977; 94:748-754.
25. King RB, Bassingthwaite JB, Hales JR, Rowell LB. Stability of heterogeneity of myocardial blood flow in normal awake baboons. Circ Res 1985; 57:285-295.
26. Franzen D, Conway RS, Zhang H, Sonnenblick EH, Eng C. Spatial heterogeneity of local blood flow and metabolite content in dog hearts. Am J Physiol 1988; 254:H344-H353.
27. Austin RE Jr, Aldea GS, Coggins DL, Flynn AE, Hoffman JI. Profound spatial heterogeneity of coronary reserve. Discordance between patterns of resting and maximal myocardial blood flow. Circ Res 1990; 67:319-331.
28. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105:539-542.
29. Ding S, Wolff SD, Epstein FH. Improved coverage in dynamic contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI using interleaved gradient-echo EPI. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39:514-519.
30. Elkington AG, Cannell TM, Gatehouse PD, Prasad SK, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. A comparison of hybrid EPI with FLASH for stress myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 518.
31. Gatehouse PD, Elkington AG, Ablitt NA, Yang GZ, Pennell DJ, Firmin DN. Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high-dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20:39-45.