From accounting to "forecounting";De la comptabilité «à la comptabilité prospective»

Canadian Accounting Perspectives

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 243-255

  Cormier, Denis ^a   Magnan, Michel L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accounting standards; Accounting theory; Financial reporting; Professional judgment

Indexed keywords

EID: 28844472861     PISSN: 14998653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1506/4CDJ-M98H-FH0Q-KQ1M     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB). 2003a. Section 5130. Materiality and risk in conducting an audit. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
2. Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB). 2003b. Section 5135. The auditor's responsibility to consider fraud and error (revised 2004). Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
3. Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB). 2003c. Section 5510. General assurance and auditing - Reservation in the auditor's report. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
4. Barth, M., W. Beaver, and W. Landsman. 1992. The market valuation implications of net periodic pension cost components. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13(1): 27-62.
5. Berthelot, S., D. Cormier, and M. Magnan. 2003. Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature 22: 1-44.
6. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). 2004. CICA handbook. Toronto: CICA.
7. Feltham, G., and J. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731.
8. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
9. Finnerty, J. D., and D. Grant. 2002. Alternative approaches to testing hedge effectiveness under SFAS 133. Accounting Horizons 16 (2): 95-109.
10. Gibbins, M., and A. K. Mason. 1988. Professional judgment in financial reporting. CICA Research Study. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
11. Macintosh, N. B., T. Shearer, D. B. Thornton, and M. Welker. 2000. Accounting as simulacrum and hyperreality: Perspectives on income and capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (1): 13-50.
12. Nelson, M., J. Elliott, and R. Tapley. 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers' and auditors' earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 175-202.
13. Pacini, C., M. J. Martin, and L. Hamilton. 2000. At the interface of law and accounting: An examination of a trend toward a reduction in the scope of auditor liability to third parties in the common law countries. American Business Law Journal 37: 171-235.
14. Scott, W. R. 2003. Financial accounting theory. Toronto: Prentice Hall.
15. Skinner, R. 1995. Judgment in jeopardy. CA Magazine (November): 14-21.
16. Webster, E., and D. B. Thornton. 2004. Earnings quality under rules- vs. principles-based accounting standards: A test of the Skinner hypothesis. Working paper, Queen's University.
17. Zeff, S. 2002. Political lobbying on proposed standards: A challenge to the IASB. Accounting Horizons 16 (1): 43-54.