Synchronous and asynchronous recursive random scale-free nets

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2005, Pages

  Comellas, Francesc ^a,b   Rozenfeld, Hernan D ^b   Ben Avraham, Daniel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RANDOM SEQUENTIAL UPDATING RULE; SCALE-FREE NETS;

RANDOM PROCESSES; SYNCHRONIZATION;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 28844463987     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.046142     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 74, 47 (2002).
2. S. N. Dorogvtsev and J. F. F. Mendes, Adv. Phys. ADPHAH 0001-8732 10.1080/00018730110112519 51, 1079 (2002).
3. M. E. J. Newman, SIAM Rev. SIREAD 0036-1445 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 45, 167 (2003).
4. H. Jeong, B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabási, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35036627 407, 651 (2000).
5. K. I. Goh, E. S. Oh, H. Jeong, B. Kahng, and D. Kim, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.202301299 99, 12583 (2002).
6. R. Guimera, S. Mossa, A. Turtschi, and L. A. N. Amaral, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0407994102 102, 7794 (2005).
7. S. N. Dorogovtsev, A. V. Goltsev, and J. F. F. Mendes, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.066122 65, 066122 (2002).
8. F. Comellas, G. Fertin, and A. Raspaud, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.037104 69, 037104 (2004).
9. J. S. Andrade, Jr., H. J. Herrmann, R. F. S. Andrade, and L. R. da Silva, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.018702 94, 018702 (2005).
10. J. P. K. Doye and C. P. Massen, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016128 71, 016128 (2005).
11. F. Comellas and M. Sampels, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00741-0 309, 231 (2002).
12. T. Zhou, G. Yan, and B. H. Wang, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.046141 71, 046141 (2005).
13. Z. Z. Zhang, F. Comellas, G. Fertin, and L. L. Rong, eprint arXiv: cond-mat0503316 (2005).
14. T. Zhou, G. Yan, P.-L. Zhou, Z.-Q. Fu, and B.-H. Wang, eprint arXiv: cond-mat0409414 (2004).
15. Z. Z. Zhang, L. L. Rong, and F. Comellas, eprint arXiv: cond-mat0502591 (2005).
16. F. Comellas (unpublished).
17. See, for example, B. Chopard and M. Droz, Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998);
18. N. Rajewsky, L. Santen, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1023/A:1023047703307 92, 151 (1998);
19. V. Privman, in Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics in One Dimension (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997), pp. 167-179.
20. E. Bollt and D. ben-Avraham, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/026 7, 26 (2005).
21. Indeed, smaller simulations of nets with a few thousand nodes fail to reveal convincing differences between the two methods and the degree exponent seems then consistent with that of the deterministic tree. Note that even with 107 nodes the largest degree in the nets are only about 100 (method b) and 300 (a).