Satisfaction surveys: Do we really need new questionnaires?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 463-464

  Apolone, Giovanni ^a   Mosconi, Paola ^a  

^a MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 28844460433     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi085     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Redmond K. The US and European regulatory systems: A comparison. J Ambulatory Care Manage 2004; 27: 105-114.
2. Willke RJ, Burke LB, Erickson P. Measuring treatment impact: A review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. Control Clin Trials 2004; 25: 535-552.
3. Weingarten S. Practice guidelines and prediction rules should be subject to careful clinical testing. JAMA 1997; 277: 1977-1978.
4. Apolone G. The state of research on multipurpose severity of illness scoring systems: Are we on target? Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 1727-1729.