Target suites for evaluating the coverage of text generators

2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Bateman, John A ^a   Hartley, Anthony F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE MARKERS; GRAMMATICAL COVERAGE; INTER SYSTEM; KEY ISSUES; NATURAL LANGUAGE ANALYSIS; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION SYSTEMS; TEXT GENERATORS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 28844452322     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bateman, John A., 1997. Enabling technology for multilingual natural language generation: the KPML development environment. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, 3(1):51-55.
2. Bateman, John A., 1999. The KPML multilingual natural language generation system, development environment and tools. At: http://purl.org/net/kpml
3. Coch, J. 1996. Evaluating and comparing three text production techniques. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 1996), Copenhagen, 249-254.
4. Elhadad, M. and Robin, J., 1996. A reusable comprehensive syntactic realization component. Demonstrations and Posters of the 1996 International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (INLG '96), 1-4.
5. Estival, D., et al., 1995. The construction of test material. TSNLP Deliverable D-WP3.1. At: http://tsnlp. dfki.uni-sb.de/tsnlp/.
6. Henschel, R., Bateman, John A. and Matthiessen, C. The solved part of NP generation. Proceedings of the ESSLI'99 Workshop on the Generation of Nominal Expressions.
7. Kasper, R., 1989 A flexible interface for linking applications to PENMAN's sentence generator. Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language.
8. Lehmann, S. et al., 1996. TSNLP-test suites for natural language processing. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 1996), Copenhagen, 711-716.
9. Lavoie, B. and Rambow, O., 1997. A fast and portable re-alizer for text generation systems. Proceedings of the Fifth. Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 265-268.
10. Lester, J. C. and Porter, B. W, 1997. Developing and empirically evaluating robust explanation generators: the KNIGHT experiments. Computational Linguistics, 23(1):65-101.
11. Mellish, C. and Dale, R., 1998. Evaluation in the context of natural language generation. Computer Speech and language, 12:349-373.
12. Netter, K. et al., 1998. DiET-Diagnostic and evaluation tools for natural language processing applications. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Granada, pp. 573-579.
13. Oepen, S., Netter, K. and Klein, J., 1997. TSNLP-Test Suites for Natural Language Processing. In J. Nerbonne (ed.), Linguistic databases. Stanford, CA: CSLI Lecture Notes.
14. Sparck-Jones, K. and Galliers, J. R., 1996. Evaluating natural language processing systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
15. van Noord, G. and Neumann, G., 1997. Syntactic generation. In R. Cole et al. (eds.), Survey of the state of the art in human language technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147-150.
16. Zock, M., 1996 The power of words in message planning. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 990-995.