Effects of capsule endoscopy on cardiac pacemakers

Endoscopy

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1181-1185

  Payeras, G ^a   Piqueras, J ^a   Moreno, V J ^a   Cabrera, A ^b   Menendez D ^b   Jimenez R ^c  

^a Sanatorio San Francisco de Asis   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL CENTRAL DE LA DEFENSA GÓMEZ ULLA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART MUSCLE POTENTIAL; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; PACEMAKER FAILURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QRS COMPLEX; TREATMENT INDICATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARRHYTHMIA; COHORT STUDIES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY; ENDOSCOPES, GASTROINTESTINAL; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 28844448757     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870558     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A et al. Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool in comparison to barium follow-through and computerized tomography in patients with suspected Crohn's disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 15: 363-367
2. Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL, et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 576-584
3. Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 2000; 405: 725-729
4. Toivonen L, Valjus J, Hongisto M et al. The influence of elevated 50 Hz electric and magnetic fields on implanted cardiac pacemakers: the role of the lead configuration and programming of the sensitivity. PACE 1991; 14: 2114-2122
5. Bernstein AD, Parsonnet V. Survey of cardiac pacing and implanted defibrillator practice patterns in the United States in 1997. PACE 2001; 24: 842-855
6. Hayes DL. Electromagnetic interference and implantable devices. Cardiac Pacing 2000; 45: 365-371
7. Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Reynolds DW et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1473-1479
8. Chauvin M, Crenner F, Brechenmacher C. Interaction between permanent cardiac pacing and electrocautery: the significance of electrode position. PACE 1992; 15: 2029-2033
9. Levine PA. Effect of cardioversion and defibrillation on implanted cardiac pacemakers. In: Barold SS (ed). Modern cardiac pacing. Mount Kisco, New York: Futura Publishing, 1985: 875-886
10. Dick AJ, Jones DL, Klein GJ. Effects of RF energy delivery to pacing and defibrillation leads. PACE 2001; 24: 658
11. Fetter, Patterson D, Aram G et al. Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on single chamber rate response and dual chamber pacemakers. PACE 1989: 12: 1494-1501
12. Guyomar Y, Vaudeville L, Heuls S et al. Interference between pacemaker and video capsule endoscopy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004; 27: 1329-1330
13. Leighton JA, Sharma VK, Srivathsan K et al. Safety of capsule endoscopy in patients with pacemakers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59: 567-569
14. Lewis BS. Small intestine bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2000; 29: 67-95