Comparison of acoustic and net sampling systems to determine patterns in zooplankton distribution

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Volumn 110, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1-11

  Sutor, Malinda ^a,b   Cowles, Timothy J ^a   Peterson, William T ^c   Lamb, Jesse ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LA Universities Marine Consortium   (United States)

^c NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC METHOD; BACKSCATTER; CONTINENTAL SHELF; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; SAMPLING; ZOOPLANKTON;

NORTH AMERICA; OREGON; PACIFIC OCEAN; PACIFIC OCEAN (NORTHEAST); UNITED STATES;

EID: 28844442000     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2004JC002681     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Costello, J. H., R. E. Pieper, and D. V. Holliday (1989), Comparison of acoustic and pump sampling techniques for the analysis of zooplankton distributions, J. Plankton Res., 11, 703-709.
2. Davis, C. S., and P. H. Wiebe (1985), Macrozooplankton biomass in a warm-core Gulf Stream ring: Time series changes in size structure, taxonomic composition, and vertical distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 8871-8884.
3. Denman, K. L. (1994), Scale determining biological-physical interactions in oceanic food webs, in Aquatic Ecology: Scale, Pattern, and Process, edited by P. S. Giller, A. G. Hildrew, and D. G. Raffaelli, pp. 377-402, Blackwell Sci., Malden, Mass.
4. Foote, K. G., and T. K. Stanton (2000), Acoustical methods, in ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual, edited by R. P. Harris et al., pp. 223-258, Elsevier, New York.
5. Greene, C. H., et al. (1998), Assessing the distribution and abundance of zooplankton: A comparison of acoustic and net-sampling methods with D-BAD MOCNESS, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 45, 1219-1237.
6. Greenlaw, C. F. (1979), Acoustical estimation of zooplankton populations, Limnol. Oceanogr., 24, 226-242.
7. Holliday, D. V., and R. E. Pieper (1980), Volume scattering strengths and zooplankton distributions at acoustic frequencies between 0.5 and 3 MHz, J. Acoustic. Soc. Am., 67, 135-146.
8. Holliday, D. V., R. E. Pieper, C. F. Greenlaw, and J. K. Dawson (1998), Acoustical sensing of small-scale vertical structures in zooplankton assemblages, Oceanography, 11, 18-23.
9. Holliday, D. V., P. L. Donaghay, C. F. Greenlaw, D. E. McGehee, M. A. McManus, J. M. Sullivan, and J. L. Miksis (2003), Advances in defining fine- and micro-scale pattern in plankton, Aquat. Living Resour., 16, 131-136.
10. Lavery, A. C., T. K. Stanton, and P. H. Wiebe (2002), Variability in high frequency acoustic backscattering in the water column, in Impact of Littoral Environmental Variability on Acoustic Predictions and Sonar Performance, edited by N. G. Pace and F. B. Jensen, pp. 63-70, Springer, New York.
11. Lawson, G. L., P. H. Wiebe, C. J. Ashjian, S. M. Gallager, C. S. Davis, and J. D. Warren (2004), Acoustically-inferred zooplankton distribution in relation to hydrography west of the Antarctic peninsula, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 51, 2041-2072.
12. Mackas, D. L., K. L. Denman, and M. R. Abbott (1985), Plankton patchiness: Biology in the physical vernacular, Bull. Mar. Sci, 37, 652-674.
13. McGehee, D. E., R. L. O'Driscoll, and L. V. Martin Traykovski (1998), Effects of orientation on acoustic scattering from Antarctic krill at 120 kHz, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 45, 1273-1294.
14. Medwin, H., and C. S. Clay (1998), Fundamentals of Acoustical Oceanography, Elsevier, New York.
15. Napp, J. M., P. B. Ortner, R. E. Pieper, and D. V. Holliday (1993), Biovolume-size spectra of epipelagic zooplankton using a Multi-frequency Acoustic Profiling System (MAPS), Deep Sea Res., Part I, 40, 445-459.
16. Smith, S. L., R. E. Pieper, M. V. Moore, L. G. Rudstam, C. H. Greene, J. E. Zamon, C. N. Flagg, and C. E. Williamson (1992), Acoustic techniques for the in situ observation of zooplankton, Arch. Hydrobiol., 36, 23-43.
17. Stamates, S. J. (2002), Estimation of suspended matter concentrations in an area of Chesapeake Bay using a calibrated acoustic Doppler current meter, M.S. thesis, Univ. of Miami, Fla.
18. Stanton, T. K., D. Chu, P. H. Wiebe, L. V. Martin Traykovski, and R. L. Eastwood (1998a), Sound scattering by several zooplankton groups. I. Experimental determination of dominant scattering mechanisms, J. Acoustic. Soc. Am., 103, 225-235.
19. Stanton, T. K., D. Chu, and P. H. Wiebe (1998b), Sound scattering by several zooplankton groups. II. Scattering models, J. Acoustic. Soc. Am., 103, 236-253.
20. Stanton, T. K., P. H. Wiebe, and D. Chu (1998c), Differences between sound scattering by weakly scattering spheres and finite-length cylinders with applications to sound scattering by zooplankton, J. Acoustic. Soc. Am., 103, 254-264.
21. Sutor, M. (2004), Finescale vertical distributions of zooplankton and their relationship to physical and biological factors: Investigations using acoustical and optical technologies, Ph.D. thesis, 297 pp., Coll. of Oceanic and Atmos. Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis.
22. Warren, J. D. (2001), Estimating Gulf of Maine zooplankton distributions using multiple frequency acoustic, video, and environmental data, Ph.D. thesis, 219 pp., Joint Prog. in Oceanogr./Appl. Ocean Sci. and Eng., Mass. Inst. of Technol./Woods Hole Oceanogr. Inst., Boston, Mass.
23. Wiebe, P. H., and M. C. Benfield (2003), From the Hensen net toward four-dimensional biological oceanography, Prog. Oceanogr., 56, 7-136.
24. Wiebe, P. H., A. W. Morton, A. M. Bradley, R. H. Backus, J. E. Craddock, V. Barber, T. J. Cowles, and G. R. Flier (1985), New developments in the MOCNESS, an apparatus for sampling zooplankton and microneckton, Mar. Biol., 87, 313-323.
25. Wiebe, P. H., D. G. Mountain, T. K. Stanton, C. H. Greene, R. G. Lough, S. Kaartvedt, J. Dawson, and N. J. Copley (1996), Acoustical study of the spatial distribution of plankton on Georges Bank and the relationship between volume backscattering strength and the taxonomic composition of the plankton, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 43, 1971-2001.