Jehovah's Witnesses in the emergency department: What are their rights?

Emergency Medicine Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 869-871

  Woolley, S ^a  

^a BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CONFLICT; COURT; DEATH; DECISION MAKING; EMERGENCY WARD; HUMAN; JEHOVAH'S WITNESS; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; SOCIETY; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CHILD; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES; PARENTAL CONSENT; PATIENT RIGHTS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 28844433360     PISSN: 14720205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2004.023382     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Harrison BG. Visions of glory: a history and memory of Jehovah's Witnesses. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1978.
2. Anonymous. "A patient in hospital may be fed through the mouth, through the nose or through the veins. When sugar solutions are given intravenously, it is called intravenous feeding. So the hospital's own terminology recognizes as feeding the process of putting nutrition into one's system via the veins. Hence the attendant administering the transfusion is feeding the patient blood through the veins, and the patient receiving it is eating through his veins. "The Watchtower 1951;July:415.
3. The Bible. Genesis 9:4, Leviticus 17:11-14, and Acts 15:20, 29.
4. Parental rights not absolute: Newmark v Williams 588 A.2d 1108 (Del. 1991),
5. Jacobson v Massachusetts 197 US 11 (1905),
6. Hawaii v Standard Oil Co. 405 US 251 (1972);
7. Rejection of the Free Exercise Clause: Prince v Massachusetts (1944) 321 US 158,
8. Walker v Superior Court 763 P, 2d 852 (1988),
9. Commonwealth v Barnhardt 497 A.2d 616 (Pa.Super. 1985),
10. Craig v State 220 Md.590 (1959),
11. People v Pierson 176 NY 201 (1903),
12. State v Norman 808 P.2d 1159 (Wash.Ct.App.1991),
13. Funkhauser v State 763 P.2d 695 (1988),
14. Commonwealth v Nickson 718 A,2d 311 (Pa.Super.Ct.1998),
15. In Re Custody of a Minor 379 NE.2d 1053 (Mass. 1978),
16. Commonwealth v Twitchell 617 NE.2d, 609 (Mass. 1993).
17. CYPA 1933, sections (1) and (2)(a) but liability here is not as a parent but as a person over 16 having the 'custody, charge or care' of a child under 16.
18. Dwyer JG. The children we abandon: religious exemption to child welfare and education laws as denials of equal protection to children of religious objectors. North Carolina L Rev 1996;74:1321.
19. Queensland Law Reform Commission. Consent to medical treatment of young people. Discussion paper 34-35 1995.
20. Prince v Massachusetts (1944) 321 US 158 at 170.
21. People ex rel. Wallace et al. v Labrenz et al., 104 N.E.2d 769 (IL 1952),
22. Morrison v State 252 S.W.2d 97 (MO C. of A. 1952),
23. State v Perricone 181 A.2d 751 (NJ 1962),
24. Hoener v Bertinato 171 A.2d 140 (NJ Juv. & Dom. Rel. C. 1961),
25. Santos v Goldstein 227 N.Y.S.2d 450 (NY 1962),
26. In re Clark 185 N.E.2d 128 (OH C. of Corn. P1., Div. Of Dom. Rel. 1962),
27. Jehovah's Witnesses v King County Hospital 278 F. Supp. 488 (W.D. Wash. 1967)
28. aff'd 390 U.S. 598 (1968),
29. In re Green 448 Pa. 338, 292 A.2d 387 (PA Supreme Court, 1972),
30. In re Sampson 317 N.Y.S.2d 641 (NY Fain. C. 1970),
31. Muhlenberg Hospital v Patterson 320 A.2d 518 (NJ Sup. C., Law D. 1974),
32. In Interest of Ivey 318 So.2d 53 (FLD.C. of A., I Dist 1975),
33. In the Matter of Tara Cabrera, a Minor 552 A.2d 1114 (Pa. Super. 1989,
34. In the Interest of JV, a Child 516 So.2d 1133,
35. In the Matter of Baby Girl Newton 1990 WL 5A916 (Del.Ch.) (unpublished opinion),
36. In the Matter of Elisha McCauley 565 N.E.2d 411 (Mass. 1991),
37. Cooper v Wiley 513 N.Y.S.2d 151 (A. D. 1 Dept. 1987).
38. Re O (A Minor) (Medical Treatment) [1993] 1 FCR 925,
39. [1993] 2 FLR 149, Re S (A Minor) (Medical Treatment) [1993] 1 FLR 376,
40. Re R (A Minor) (Blood Transfusion) [1993] 2 FCR 544.
41. Birkett v Director General of Family and Community Services (Unreported decision of Supreme Court of New South Wales, 3 Feb. 1994, No. 3161 of 1991),
42. Dalton v Skuthorpe (unreported decision of Supreme Court of New South Wales, 17 Nov. 1992, No. 5094 of 1992,
43. Marchant v Finney (unreported decision of Supreme Court of New South Wales, 31 July 1992, No. 3599 of 1992),
44. Director General, Department of Community Services Plaintiff and BB Defendants [1999]
45. NSWSC 1169 (19 November 1999).
46. Custody of a Minor 375 Mass. 733, 379 N.E.2d 1053 (1978).
47. Prince v Massachusetts (1944) 321 US 158,
48. Custody of a Minor 375 Mass. 733, 379 N.E.2d 1053 (1978).
49. Prince v Massachusetts (1944) 321 US 158,
50. Jacobson v Massachusetts 197 U.S. 11 (1905).
51. Re L. D.K.; Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto v K and K (1985) 48 R.F.L. (2d) 164, 23 C.R.R 337,
52. Re Y.(A.) (1993) 111 Nfld. & P.E.I.R 91, 348 A.P.R. 91, Walker (Litigation Guardian of) v Region 2 Hospital Corp. (1994) 4 RFL (4th) 321, 116 DLR (4th) 477, 150 NBR (2d) 366, 385 APR 366.
53. H (T) v Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto (1996) 138 DLR (4th) 144 (sub nom. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto v TH) 9 OTC 274, 37 CRR (2d) 270,
54. U (C.)(Next Friend of) v Alberta (Director of Child Welfare), 2000 ABQB 626, [2001] 3 WWR 575, 273 AR 106,
55. 87 Alta LR (3d) 144, 3 WWR 575, [2000] AJ No. 1067,
56. Alberta (Director of Child Welfare) v H (B) 2002 ABPC 39, [2002] 11 WWR 752,
57. 6 Alta LR (4th) 34, 31 RFL (5th) 16.
58. In re EG 549 N.E.2d 322 at 328 (Ill. 1989),
59. Belcher v Charleston Area Med. Ctr.,
60. 422 S.E.2d 827 (W. Va. 1992)
61. and W. VA. CODE § 16-30C-6 (1998);
62. Cardwell v Bechtol 724 S.W.2d 739 (Tenn. 1987).
63. Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act, 1991.
64. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1985] 3 All ER 402.
65. Re R (A Minor)(Wardship: Consent to Medical Treatment) [1992] Fam. 11,
66. Re W (A Minor)(Medical Treatment: Courts Jurisdiction) [1993] Fam, 64,
67. Re S (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1994] 2 FLR 1065,
68. Re E (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1993] 1 FLR 386,
69. Re L (Medical Treatment: Gillick Competence) [1999] 2 FCR 524,
70. [1998] 2 FLR 810.
71. Re E (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1993] 1 FLR 386,
72. Re 5 (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1994] 2 FLR 1065,
73. Re L (Medical Treatment: Gillick Competence) [1999] 2 FCR 524,
74. [1998] 2 FLR 810.
75. Annotation. Religion as a Factor in Child Custody and Visitation Cases 22 ALR 4th 971 (1983).
76. Erickson v Dilgard 252 N.Y.S.2d 705 (NY 1962).
77. Application of President and Dir of Georgetown College, 331 F.2d 1000 (D.C.Cir. 1964),
78. cert. Denied 377 U.S. 978 (1964),
79. Raleigh Fitkin-Paul Morgan Memorial Hospital v Anderson 201 A.2d 537 (NJ 1964).
80. Powell v Columbian Presbyterian Medical Center 267 N.Y.S.2d 450 (NY 1965).
81. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital v Heston 279 A.2d 670 (NJ 1971).
82. In re Estate of Dorone 517 Pa. 3, 534 A.2d 452 (1987),
83. Werth v Taylor 475 N.W.2d 426 (Mich. App. 1991),
84. In the Matter of Alice Hughes 611 A.2d 1148 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1992).
85. In re Conroy 98 NJ 321, A86 A.2d 1209 (1985).
86. In re Brown A78 So.2d 1033 (MS 1985).
87. In re Brown 478 So.2d 1037 (MS 1985).
88. Public Health Trust v Wons 500 So. 2d 679 Public Health Trust v Wons aff'd 541 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 1989),
89. In re Duran 769 A.2d 497 (Sup. Ct. Penn 2001).
90. Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [1985] AC 871, 904F.
91. In Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam 95 at 121H (per Lord Justice Staughton).
92. Culver, CM. Advance Directives. Psychology, public policy and law 1998;4:676-87.
93. The Voluntary Euthanasia Society. Living wills. www.ves.org.uk/DebLivWill.html.
94. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. Jehovah's Witness blood refusal card. New York: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc, 1998.
95. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. How can blood save your life? New York: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc, 1990.
96. Ridley DT. Honoring Jehovah's Witnesses' advance directives in emergencies: a response to Drs Migden and Braen. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:824-35, quoting Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts Section 18, at 117 (5th ed, 1984).
97. Ridley DT. Honoring Jehovah's Witnesses' advance directives in emergencies: a response to Drs. Migden and Braen. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:824-35, quoting President' s Commission For the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine, Making Healthc Decis 1982;93.
98. In re Estate of Darrell Dorone 534 A.2d 452 (Pa. 1987),
99. Malette v Shulman 72 O.R.2d 417 (Ont. Ct. App. 1990).
100. In re Estate of Darrell Dorone 534 A.2d 452 (Pa. 1987).
101. In re Estate of Darrell Dorone 534 A.2d 452 (Pa. 1987.; "The emergency exception applies when immediate treatment is required to preserve life or prevent...serious impairment...but consent cannot be obtained from a patient...and there is no indication that the treatment would be refused were the patient...able to make his or her wishes known."
102. Malette v Shulman 72 O.R. 2d 417: "the doctor could administer blood transfusions without incurring liability...if he had no reason to believe that the patient, if she had the opportunity to consent, would decline..., if he knows that the patient has refused to consent to the proposed procedure, he is not empowered to overrule the patient's decision by substituting his decision for hers even though he, and most others, may think hers a foolish or unreasonable decision"., (Ont. Ct. App. 1990).
103. Malette v Shulman 72 O.R.2d 417 (Ont. Ct. App. 1990) at 431.
104. HE v A Hospital NHS Trust [2003] EWHC 1017 (Fam), [2003] 2 FLR 408,
105. [2003] Fam Law 733.