Rawls' theory of justice: A naturalistic evaluation

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 449-465

  Ho, Mun Chan ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Chinese conception of social justice; Naturalism; Rawls' Theory of Justice

Indexed keywords

CHINA; CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURAL FACTOR; ETHICS; GOVERNMENT; HONG KONG; JUSTICE; METHODOLOGY; MORALITY; MOTIVATION; PHILOSOPHY; REVIEW; SAMPLING; THEORETICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ADULT; CHINA; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INCOME; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 28744450577     PISSN: 03605310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03605310500253022     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1991). "Is human cognition adaptive?. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 14:, 471-485.
3. rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bond, D., & Park, J. (1991). An empirical test of Rawls's theory of justice: A second approach, in Korea and the United States. Simulation & Gaming,, 22(4), 443-462.
5. Brown, J. R. (1991). The laboratory of the mind: Thought experiments in the natural sciences. London: Routledge.
6. Brown, J. R. (2004). Why thought experiments transcend empiricism. In C. Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science (pp. 23-43). Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Casebeer, W. D. (2003). Natural ethical facts: Evolution, connectionism, and moral cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Chan, H. M. (2004). Ethics of care and political practices in Hong Kong. In B. H. Chua (ed.), Communitarian Politics in Asia (pp. 102-121). London: Routledge.
9. Chan, H. M. (2004, 2005). Cost-effectiveness analysis: An ethical evaluation. Newsletter of Hong Kong Society of Health Service Executives Issues II, pp. 6-10.
10. Cherniak, C. (1986). Minimal rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. nd (pp. 239-261). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Flanagan, O. (1996). Ethics naturalized: Ethics as human ecology. In L. May, M. Friedman & A. Clark (eds.), Minds and morals (pp. 19-43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Frohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. A. (1992). Choosing justice: An experimental approach to ethical theory. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
14. Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychologial Bulletin, 101:, 75-90.
15. Goldman, A. I. (1993). Philosophical applications of cognitive science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16. th ed). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Hampshire, S. (1989). Innocence and experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Harman, G. (1977). The nature of morality: An introduction to ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. D.Kahneman P. Slovic A. Tversky 1982. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kornblith, H. (1993). Inductive inference and its natural ground: An essay in naturalistic epistemology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Lopes, L. L., & Oden, G. C. (1991). The rationality of intelligence. In E. Eells & T. Maruszewski (eds.), Probability and rationality: Studies on L. Jonathan Cohen's philosophy of science (pp. 199-223). Rodopi: Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities.
24. L. May M. Friedman A. Clark 1996. Minds and morals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Miller, D. (1992). "Distributive justice: What the people think. Ethics" 102:, 555-593.
26. Mikhail, J., Sorentino, C., & Spelke, E. (1998). Toward a universal moral grammar. In M. Gernsbacher & S. Derry (eds.), Proceedings, Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (p. 1250). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Munro, D. J. (2005). A Chinese ethics for the new century: The Ch'ien Mu Lectures in History and Culture, and other essays on science and Confucian ethics. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
28. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently...and why. New York: The Free Press.
29. Norton, J. D. (2004). Why thought experiments do not transcend empiricism. In C. Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science (pp. 44-46). Oxford: Blackwell.
30. O'Neill, P., & Petrinovich, L. (1998). A preliminary cross-cultural study of moral intuitions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19:, 349-367.
31. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
33. Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Simons, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In C.B. Radner & R. Radner (eds.), Decision and organization. (pp. 161-172). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
35. Simons, H. A. (1983). Alternative visions of rationality. In P. K. Moser (ed.), Rationality in action: Contemporary approaches (pp. 189-206). Cambridge: Cambride University Press.
36. Sorensen, R. A. (1992). Thought experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Ubel, P. A. (2000). Pricing life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.