Functional restraints on the patterns of amino acid substitutions: Application to sequence-structure homology recognition

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 722-731

  Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi ^a   Blundell, Tom ^a   Mizuguchi, Kenjii ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

FUGUE; Functional site; Homology recognition; Structural restraints; Substitution tables

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; CATALYSIS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; EXOPEPTIDASES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 28644449596     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20617     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Fitch WM. An improved method of testing for evolutionary homology. J Mol Biol 1966;16:9-16.
2. McLachlan AD. Repeating sequences and gene duplication in proteins. J Mol Biol 1972;64:417-437.
3. Dayhoff MO, Schwartz RM, Orcutt BC. A model for evolutionary change. Dayhoff MO, editor. Washington, D. C.: National Biomedical Research Foundation; 1978. 345-358 p.
4. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1992;8:275-282.
5. Risler JL, Delorme MO, Delacroix H, Henaut A. Amino acid substitutions in structurally related proteins. A pattern recognition approach. Determination of a new and efficient scoring matrix. J Mol Biol 1988;204:1019-1029.
6. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
7. Overington J, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL. Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1990;241:132-145.
8. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001;310:243-257.
9. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:10915-10919.
10. Mizuguchi K, Deane CM, Blundell TL, Overington JP. HOMSTRAD: a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. Protein Sci 1998;7:2469-2471.
11. Williams MG, Shirai H, Shi J, Nagendra HG, Mueller J, Mizuguchi K, Miguel RN, Lovell SC, Innis CA, Deane CM, et al. Sequence-structure homology recognition by iterative alignment refinement and comparative modeling. Proteins 2001;Suppl(5):92-97.
12. Burke DF, Deane CM, Nagarajaram HA, Campillo N, Martin-Martinez M, Mendes J, Molina F, Perry J, Reddy BV, Soares CM, et al. An iterative structure-assisted approach to sequence alignment and comparative modeling. Proteins 1999;Suppl(3):55-60.
13. Chelliah V, Chen L, Blundell TL, Lovell SC. Distinguishing structural and functional restraints in evolution in order to identify interaction sites. J Mol Biol 2004;342:1487-1504.
14. Kullback S. Information theory and statistics. New York: Wiley, 1959.
15. Lin J. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans Info Theory 1991;37:145-151.
16. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol 2002;315(5):1257-1275.
17. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D226-229.
18. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-410.
19. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter MC, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin MJ, Michoud K, O'Donovan C, Phan I, et al. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:365-370.
20. Johnson MS, Overington JP, Blundell TL. Alignment and searching for common protein folds using a data bank of structural templates. J Mol Biol 1993;231:735-752.
21. Dayhoff MO, Barker WC, Hunt LT. Establishing homologies in protein sequences. Methods Enzymol 1983;91:524-545.
22. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4680.
23. Thompson JD, Plewniak F, Poch O. A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignment programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:2682-2690.
24. Thompson JD, Plewniak F, Poch O. BAliBASE: a benchmark alignment database for the evaluation of multiple alignment programs. Bioinformatics 1999;15:87-88.
25. Wilcoxon F. Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics 1947;3:119-122.
26. Siegel S, Castellan, NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences; 1988. 399 p.
27. Bartlett GJ, Porter CT, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. J Mol Biol 2002;324:105-121.
28. Ouzounis C, Perez-Irratxeta C, Sander C, Valencia A. Are binding residues conserved? Pac Symp Biocomput 1998:401-412.
29. Overington J, Donnelly D, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL. Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Sci 1992;12:216-226.
30. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 147;1981:195-197.
31. Mizuguchi K. Fold recognition for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today TARGETS 2004;31:18-23.
32. Mizuguchi K, Deane CM, Blundell TL, Johnson MS, Overingon JP. JOY: Protein sequence-structure representation and analysis. Bioinformatics 1998;147:617-623.