Scaling up keystone effects from simple to complex ecological networks

Ecology Letters

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1317-1325

  Brose, Ulrich ^a,b   Berlow, Eric L ^b,c,d   Martinez, Neo D ^b  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b Pacific Ecoinformatics and Computational Ecology Lab   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Complexity; Food web; Interaction strength; Networks; Population dynamics; Predation; Resource enrichment; Species removal; Trophic cascades

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; FOOD WEB; KEYSTONE SPECIES; TROPHIC CASCADE;

EID: 28644449040     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00838.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Berlow, E.L. (1999). Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature, 398, 330-334.
2. Berlow, E.L., Navarrete, S.A., Briggs, C.J., Power, M.E. & Menge, B.A. (1999). Quantifying variation in the strengths of species interactions. Ecology, 80, 2206-2224.
3. Berlow, E.L., Neutel, A.M., Cohen, J.E., de Ruiter, P.C., Ebenman, B., Emmerson, M. et al. (2004). Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities. J. Anim. Ecol., 73, 585-598.
4. Brose, U., Williams, R.J. & Martinez, N.D. (2003). Comment on "Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability". Science, 301, 918.
5. Brose, U., Berlow, E.L. & Martinez, N.D. (in press). From food webs to ecological networks: linking non-linear trophic interactions with nutrient competition. In: Dynamic Food Webs: Multi-species Assemblages, Ecosystem Development, and Environmental Change (eds De Ruiter, P., Moore, J.C. & Wolters, V.). Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
6. Brose, U., Cushing, L., Banasek-Richter, C., Berlow, E.L., Bersier, L.-F., Blanchard, J.L. et al. (2005). Body sizes of consumers and their resources. Ecology, 86, 2545.
7. Brown, J.H. & Heske, E.J. (1990). Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science, 250, 1705-1707.
8. Davic, R.D. (2003). Linking keystone species and functional groups: a new operational definition of the keystone species concept - response. Conserv. Ecol., 7, r11.
9. De'ath, G. & Fabricius, K.E. (2000). Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology, 81, 3178-3192.
10. Dunne, J.A., Williams, R.J. & Martinez, N.D. (2004). Network structure and robustness of marine food webs. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 273, 291-302.
11. Estes, J.A., Tinker, M.T., Williams, T.M. & Daok, D.F. (1998). Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science, 282, 473-476.
12. Fussmann, G.F. & Heber, G. (2002). Food web complexity and chaotic population dynamics. Ecol. Lett., 5, 394-401.
13. Graedel, T.E., Alldredge, A., Barron, E., Davis, M., Field, C., Fischhoff, B. et al. (2001). Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
14. Grantham, B.A., Chan, F., Nielsen, K.J., Fox, D.S., Barth, J.A., Huyer, A. et al. (2004). Upwelling-driven nearshore hypoxia signals ecosystem and océanographie changes in the northeast Pacific. Nature, 429, 749-754.
15. Grover, J.P. (1994). Assembly rules for communities of nutrient-limited plants and specialist herbivores. Am. Nat., 143, 258-282.
16. Hedges, L.V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P.S. (1999). The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology, 80, 1150-1156.
17. Holling, C.S. (1959). Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol., 7, 385-398.
18. Holt, R.D. (1977). Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor. Popul. Biol., 12, 197-229.
19. Holt, R.D., Grover, H. & Tilman, D. (1994). Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am. Nat., 144, 741-771.
20. Huisman, J. & Weissing, F.J. (1999). Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature, 402, 407-410.
21. Huisman, J., Johansson, A.M., Folmer, E.O. & Weissing, F.J. (2001). Towards a solution of the plankton paradox: the importance of physiology and life history. Ecol. Lett., 4, 408-411.
22. Laska, M.S. & Wootton, J.T. (1998). Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength. Ecology, 79, 461-476.
23. Leibold, M.A. (1996). A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. Am. Nat., 147, 784-812.
24. McCann, K., Hastings, A. & Huxel, G.R. (1998). Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature, 395, 794-798.
25. Menge, B.A. (1995). Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: patterns and importance. Ecol. Monogr., 65, 21-74.
26. Menge, B.A., Berlow, E.L., Blanchette, C., Navarrete, S.A. & Yamada, S.B. (1994). The keystone species concept: variation in interaction strength in a rocky intertidal habitat. Ecol. Monogr., 64, 249-286.
27. Mills, L.S., Soule, M.E. & Doak, D.F. (1993). The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. Bioscience, 43, 219-224.
28. Morin, P.J. (1983). Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol. Monogr., 53, 119-138.
29. Navarrete, S.A. (1996). Variable predation: effects of whelks on a mid intertidal successional community. Ecol. Monogr., 66, 301-321.
30. Navarrete, S.A. & Castilla, J.C. (2003). Experimental determination of predation intensity in an intertidal predator guild: dominant versus subordinate prey. Oikos, 100, 251-262.
31. Navarrete, S.A. & Menge, B.A. (1996). Keystone predation and interaction strength: interactive effects of predators on their main prey. Ecol. Monogr., 66, 409-429.
32. Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S.D., Arruda, J. & Niemela, P. (1981). Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am. Nat., 118, 240-261.
33. Paine, R.T. (1969). A note on trophic complexity and community stability. Am. Nat., 103, 91-93.
34. Paine, R.T. (1992). Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength. Nature, 355, 73-75.
35. Polis, G.A. & Strong, D.R. (1996). Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am. Nat., 147, 813-846.
36. Power, M.E., Tilman, D., Estes, J., Menge, B.A., Bond, W.J., Mills, L.S. et al. (1996). Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience, 46, 609-620.
37. Sala, E. & Graham, M.H. (2002). Community-wide distribution of predator-prey interaction strength in kelp forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 99, 3678-3683.
38. Sanford, E. (1999). Regulation of keystone predation by small changes in ocean temperature. Science, 283, 2095-2097.
39. Schoener, T.W. (1993). On the relative importance of direct versus indirect effects in ecological communities. In: Mutualism and Community Organisation: Behavioural, Theoretical, and Food-Web Approaches (eds Kawanabe, H., Cohen, J.E. & Iwasaki, K.). Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 365-411.
40. Strong, D.R. (1992). Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology, 73, 747-754.
41. Tilman, D. (1977). Resource competition between planktonic algae - experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology, 58, 338-348.
42. Williams, R.J. & Martinez, N.D. (2000). Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature, 404, 180-183.
43. Williams, R.J. & Martinez, N.D. (2004a). Limits to trophic levels and omnivory in complex food webs: theory and data. Am. Nat., 163, 458-468.
44. Williams, R.J. & Martinez, N.D. (2004b). Stabilizaton of chaotic and non-permanent food web dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. B, 38, 297-303.
45. Williams, R.J., Martinez, N.D., Berlow, E.L., Dunne, J.A. & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Two degrees of separation in complex food webs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 99, 12913-12916.
46. Yodzis, P. (2000). Diffuse effects in food webs. Ecology, 81, 261-266.
47. Yodzis, P. & Innes, S. (1992). Body size and consumer-resource dynamics. Am. Nat., 139, 1151-1175.