Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes: Cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 620-625

  Dalprà, Leda ^a   Giardino, Daniela ^b   Finelli, Palma ^b,c   Corti, Cecilia ^b   Valtorta, Chiara ^b   Guerneri, Silvana ^d   Ilardi, Patrizia ^d   Fortuna, Renata ^d   Coviello, Domenico ^d   Nocera, Gianfranco ^c   Amico, Francesco Paolo ^c   Martinoli, Emanuela ^c   Sala, Elena ^e   Villa, Nicoletta ^e   Crosti, Francesca ^e   Chiodo, Francamaria ^f   Di Cantogno, Ludovica Verdun ^g   Savin, Elisa ^g   Croci, Gianfranco ^h   Franchi, Fabrizia ^h   Venti, Giovanna ⁱ   Donti, Emilio ⁱ   Migliori, Valeria ^j   Pettinari, Antonella ^j   Bonifacio, Stefania ^k   Centrone, Claudia ^k   Torricelli, Francesca ^k   Rossi, Simona ^l   Simi, Paolo ^l   Granata, Paola ^m   Casalone, Rosario ^m   Lenzini, Elisabetta ⁿ   Artifoni, Lina ⁿ   Pecile, Vanna ^h   Barlati, Sergio ^o   Bellotti, Daniela ^o   Caufin, Daniele ^p   Police, Adalgisa ^q   Cavani, Simona ^r   Piombo, Giuseppe ^r   Pierluigi, Mauro ^r   Larizza, Lidia ^b,c   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO AUXOLOGICO ITALIANO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d ICP   (Italy)

^e Genetics Laboratory   (Italy)

^f Prenatal Cytogenetic Laboratory   (Italy)

^g Med Genetic Laboratory   (Italy)

^h Arcispedale SM Nuova ^*

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^j Cytogenetic Laboratory   (Italy)

^k Cytogenetic Genetic Laboratory   (Italy)

^l Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetics   (Italy)

^m Microbiology and Cytogenetic Laboratory   (Italy)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^o Bresda University   (Italy)

^p Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetics Laboratory   (Italy)

^q Genetic Medical Laboratory   (Italy)

^r Genetics Laboratory   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

Cooperative study; Genetic counseling; Genotype phenotype correlations; Prenatal diagnosis; Supernumerary marker chromosomes

Indexed keywords

ACROCENTRIC CHROMOSOME; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 15; CHROMOSOME 6; CHROMOSOME 8; CHROMOSOME MARKER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETICS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; ISOCHROMOSOME; KARYOTYPE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORPHOLOGY; PERINATAL PERIOD; PHENOTYPE; SUPERNUMERARY CHROMOSOME;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; ITALY; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 28644446951     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000182876.57766.2d     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Nielsen J, Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Hum Genet 1991;87:81-83.
2. Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet 1991;49:995-1013.
3. Diagnostica Citogenetica, Consensus 1995. Associazione Italiana di Citogenetica Medica. Analysis 1995;8.
4. EUCROMIC Quality Assessment Group. Quality guide-lines and standards for genetic laboratories/clinics in prenatal diagnosis on fetal samples obtained by invasive procedures. Eur J Hum Genet 1997;5:342-350.
5. Mitelman F. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN). Basel: S. Karger; 1995;8.
6. Doneda L, Dalprà L, Larizza L. Prenatal diagnosis of an extranimerary i(22p) with normal phenotype. Ann Genet 1993;36:154-158.
7. Tibiletti MG, Sala E, Colombo D, Arlati S, Varisco T, La Placa G. Chromosome 22 marker in a child with Duane syndrome and urogenital abnormalities. Ann Genet 1996;39:168-172.
8. Bettio D, Rizzi N, Giardino D, Guerrieri F, et al. FISH characterization of small supernumerary marker chromosomes in two Prader-Willi patients. Am J Med Genet 1997;68:99-104.
9. Pierluigi M, Battaglia P, Perfumo C, Baroncini A, Bricarelli FD. Combined use of cytogenetic analysis and FISH for the identification of two antenatal de novo markers as Robertsonian translocations involving the p arms. Ann Genet 1997;40:99-103.
10. Giardino D, Bettio D, Gottardi G, Rizzi N, et al. FISH characterization of two supernumerary r(1) associated with distinct clinical phenotypes. Am J Med Genet 1999;84:377-380.
11. Villa N, Riva P, Colombo D, Sala F, et al. Identification of a small supernumerary marker chromosome, r(2)(p10;q11.2), and the problem of determining prognosis. Pren Diagn 2001;21:801-805.
12. Borgatti R, Piccinelli P, Passoni D, Dalprà L, et al. Relationship between clinical and genetic features in "inverted duplicated chromosome15" patients. Pediatr Neurol 2001;24: 111-116.
13. Giardino D, Finelli P, Russo S, Gottardi G, et al. Small familial supernumerary ring 2: FISH characterization and genotype-phenotype correlation. Am J Med Genet 2002;111:319-323.
14. Demori E, Devescovi R, Benussi DG, Dolce S, et al. Supernumerary ring chromosome 8: clinical and molecular cytogenetic characterization in a case report. Am J Med Genet 2004;130A(3):288-294.
15. Wald NJ, Kennard A. Prenatal biochemical screening for Down's syndrome and neural tube defects. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1992;4(2):302-307.
16. Amor DJ, Choo KH. Neocentromeres: role in human disease, evolution, and centromere study. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71:695-714.
17. Anderlid BM, Sahlen S, Schoumans J, Holmberg E, et al. Detailed characterization of 12 supernumerary ring chromosomes using micro-FISH and search for uniparental disomy. Am J Med Genet 2001;99:223-233.
18. Stankiewicz P, Bocian E, Jakubów-Durska K, Obersztyn E, et al. Identification of supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosomes 5, 6, 19, and 20 using FISH. J Med Genet 2000;37:114-120.
19. Daniel A, Malafiej P. A series of supernumerary small ring marker autosomes identified by FISH with chromosome probe arrays and literature review excluding chromosome 15. Am J Med Genet 2003;117A:212-222.
20. Starke H, Nietzel A, Weise A, Heller A, et al. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs): genotype-phenotype correlation and classification. Hum Genet 2003;114:51-67.
21. Yagi H, Furutani Y, Hamada H, Sasaki T, et al. Role of TBX1 in human de122q11.2 syndrome. Lancet 2003;362:1366-1373.
22. Bartsch O, Nemeckova M, Kocarek E, Wagner A, et al. DiGeorge/ velocardiofacial syndrome: FISH studies of chromosomes 22q11 and 10p14, and clinical reports on the proximal 22q11 deletion. Am J Med Genet 2003;117A:1-5.
23. Whittington J, Holland A, Webb T, Butler J, Clarke D, Boer H. Relationship between clinical and genetic diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome. (Letter) J Med Genet 2002;39:926-932.
24. Liehr T, Claussen U, Starke H. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in humans. Cytogenet Genome Res 2004;107:55-67.
25. Crolla JA, Youings SA, Ennis S, Jacobs PA. Supernumerary marker chromosomes in man: parental origin, mosaicism and maternal age revisited. Eur J Hum Genet 2005;13:154-160.
26. Crolla JA. FISH and molecular studies of autosomal supernumerary marker chromosomes excluding those from chromosome 15: review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 1998;75:367-381.
27. Dalprà L, Tibiletti MG, Cristiani C, Ragni G, Crosignani PM. Morphology and nuclear contents in IVF embryos. Ann Genet 1993;36:100-106.
28. Kotzot D. Supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMC) and uniparental disomy (UPD): coincidence or consequence? J Med Genet 2002;39:775-778.