Automatic and imperative motor activations in stimulus-response compatibility: Magnetoencephalographic analysis of upper and lower limbs

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 168, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 51-61

  Kato, Yuichiro ^a,b   Endo, Hiroshi ^b   Kizuka, Tomohiro ^c   Asami, Takaaki ^d  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^d Chukyo Women's University   (Japan)

Author keywords

Automatic motor activation; Imperative motor activation; Magnetoencephalography; Response programming; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MUSCLE; ARTICLE; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; DIPOLE; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEG MUSCLE; LIMB MOVEMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 28644431838     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0090-2     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anzola GP, Bertoloni G, Buchtel HA, Rizzolatti G (1977) Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia 15:295-302
2. Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscle alive: their functions revealed by electromyography. Williams& Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 125-353
3. Coles MGH (1989) Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology and cognition. Psychophysiology 26:251-269
4. Coles MGH, Gratton G, Bashore TR, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1985) A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:529-553
5. De Jong R, Liang CC, Lauber E (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:731-750
6. Eimer M (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:837-854
7. Eimer M, Hommel B, Prinz W (1995) S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychol 90:301-313
8. Endo H, Kizuka T, Masuda T, Takeda T (1999) Automatic activation in the human primary motor cortex synchronized with movement preparation. Cogn Brain Res 8:229-239
9. Fitts PM, Deininger RL (1954) S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. J Exp Psychol 48:483-492
10. Fitts PM, Seeger CM (1953) S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response code. J Exp Psychol 46:193-210
11. Georgopoulos AP, Lurito J, Petrides M, Schwartz A, Massey J (1989) Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science 243:234-236
12. Ghez C (1991) Voluntary movement. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH (eds) Principles of neural science. Elsevier, New York, pp 609-625
13. Gratton G, Coles MG, Sirevaag EJ, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1988) Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:331-344
14. Guadagnoli M, Lander JE, Reeve G, Dornier LA (1992) Contribution of premotor and motor times to stimulus-response compatibility effects. J Hum Mov Stud 22:65-70
15. Hasbroucq T, Burle B, Akamatsu M, Vidai F, Possamaï CA (2001) An electromyographic investigation of the effect of stimulus-response mapping on choice reaction time. Psychophysiology 38:157-162
16. Heister G, Schroeder-Heister P (1985) S-R compatibility effect or cerebral laterality effect: comments on a controversy. Neuropsychologia 23:427-430
17. Hommel B (1993) The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychol Res 55:280-290
18. Kato Y, Asami T (1998) Difference in stimulus-response compatibility effect in premotor and motor time between upper and lower limbs. Percept Mot Skills 87:939-946
19. Kato Y, Asami T, Koshi M, Kizuka T (2000) Difference of S-R compatibility effect in left and right hemispatial response positions between upper and lower limbs (In Japanese). J Soc Biomech 24:939-946
20. Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull 70:387-403
21. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253-270
22. Kornblum S, Stevens GT, Requin J (1999) The effects of irrelevant stimuli. 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:688-714
23. Leuthold H, Sommer W, Ulrich R (1996) Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. J Exp Psychol Gen 125:307-323
24. Masaki H, Takasawa N, Yamazaki K (2000) An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology 37:464-472
25. Miller J (1998) Effects of stimulus-response probability on choice reaction time: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1521-1534
26. Müller-Gethmann H, Rinkenauer G, Stahl J, Ulrich R (2000) Preparation of response force and movement direction: onset effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 37:507-514
27. Nicoletti R, Umiltà C (1994) Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychol Res 56:144-150
28. Nicoletti R, Anzola GP, Luppino G, Rizzolatti G, Umiltà C (1982) Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 8:664-673
29. Nicoletti R, Umiltà C, Ladavas E (1984) Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychol 57:133-143
30. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113
31. Praamstra P, Schmitz F, Freund HJ, Schmitzler A (1999) Magnetoencephalographic correlates of the lateralized readiness potential. Cogn Brain Res 8:77-85
32. Requin J, Brener J, Ring C (1991) Preparation for action. In: Jenning JR, Coles MGH (eds) Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: central and automatic nervous system approaches. Wiley, New York, pp 357-448
33. Riehle A, Kornblum S, Requin J (1997) Neuronal correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1708-1726
34. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (1999) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 41-203
35. Stoffer TH, Umiltà C (1997) Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect. In: Hommel B, Prinz W (eds) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 181-208
36. Stürmer B, Leuthold H, Soetens E, Schröter H, Sommer W (2002) Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:1345-1363
37. Umiltà C, Nicoletti R (1990) Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In: Proctor RW, Reeve TG (eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 89-116
38. Valle-Inclán F, Redondo M (1998) On the automaticity of ipsi-lateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology 35:366-371
39. Wallace RJ (1971) S-R compatibility and idea of the response code. J Exp Psychol 88:354-360
40. Wallace RJ (1972) Spatial S-R compatibility effects involving kinesthetic cues. J Exp Psychol 93:163-168
41. Wascher E, Wauschkuhn B (1996) The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 99:149-162
42. Zelaznik HN, Franz E (1990) Stimulus-response compatibility and the programming of motor activity: pitfalls and possible new directions. In: Proctor RW, Reeve TG (eds) Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 279-295