|
Volumn 52, Issue 66, 2005, Pages 1845-1848
|
Can a small ultrasonic dissector equipped for electrocautery improve the results of hepatic resection?
|
Author keywords
Electrocautery; Hepatic resection; Quality of hepatectomy; Ultrasonic dissector
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BILE DUCT CANCER;
BLEEDING;
CAUTERIZATION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
HUMAN;
LIVER CELL CARCINOMA;
LIVER METASTASIS;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MORBIDITY;
OPERATION DURATION;
PARTIAL HEPATECTOMY;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SURGICAL ERROR;
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT;
ULTRASONIC DISSECTOR;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL;
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES;
ELECTROCOAGULATION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HEPATECTOMY;
HUMANS;
LIVER NEOPLASMS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROBABILITY;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
REFERENCE VALUES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ULTRASONICS;
|
EID: 28544450382
PISSN: 01726390
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (11)
|