How reproducible is cutaneous electrogastrography? An in-depth evidence-based study

Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 800-809

  Jonderko, Krzysztof ^a,b   Kasicka Jonderko, A ^a   Krusiec Swidergol B ^a   Dzielicki, M ^a   Stroj L ^a   Dolinski M ^a   Dolinski K ^a   Blonska Fajfrowska B ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Poland)

Author keywords

Electrogastrography; Gastric myoelectrical activity; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTROGASTROGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIQUID; MALE; MYOELECTRICITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; POSTPRANDIAL STATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKIN SURFACE; SOLID; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOMACH FUNCTION; STOMACH MOTILITY; TEST MEAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POSTPRANDIAL PERIOD; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STOMACH;

EID: 28544436029     PISSN: 13501925     EISSN: 13652982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00707.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Alvarez WC. The electrogastrogram and what it shows. JAMA 1922; 78: 1116-9.
2. Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Barnett JL, Eaker EY. Electrogastrography: a document prepared by the gastric section of the American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003; 15: 89-102.
3. Jonderko K. Short- and long-term reproducibility of radioisotopic examination of gastric emptying. Nucl Med Biol 1990; 17: 297-301.
4. Nayar DS, Khandwala F, Achkar E et al. Esophageal manometry: assessment of interpreter consistency. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 218-24.
5. De Schepper H, Camilleri M, Cremonini F, Foxx-Orenstein A, Burton D. Comparison of gastric volumes in response to isocaloric liquid and mixed meals in humans. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004; 16: 567-73.
6. Xing JH, Chen JDZ. Reproducibility of gastric tone, compliance and gastric accommodation assessed with barostat in conscious dogs. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2005; 17: 83-8.
7. Real Martínez Y, Ruiz de León A, Díaz-Rubio M. Reproducibility of ambulatory cutaneous electrogastrography in healthy volunteers. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2001; 93: 92-5.
8. 13C Spirulina platensis gastric emptying breath test and electrogastrogram: a controlled study in healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2041-50.
9. Riezzo G, Pezzolla F, Thouvenot J, Giorgio I. Reproducibility of cutaneous electrogastrography in the fasting state in man. Pathol Biol 1992; 40: 889-94.
10. Koch KL, Hong SP, Xu L. Reproducibility of gastric myoelectrical activity and the water load test in patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia symptoms and in control subjects. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 31: 125-9.
11. Ludbrook J. Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2002; 29: 527-36.
12. Jonderko K, Krusiec-Świdergoł B, Mazur W et al. Effect of single dose administration of recombinant interferon-alpha2b on gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 1035-44.
13. Jonderko K, Kasicka-Jonderko A, Błońska-Fajfrowska B. Does body posture affect the parameters of a cutaneous electrogastrogram? J Smooth Muscle Res 2005; 41: 133-140.
14. Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
15. Loo FD, Palmer D, Soergel K, Kalbfleisch IH, Wood CM. Gastric emptying in patients with diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterology 1984; 86: 485-94.
16. Armitage P. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Melbourne: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1978.
17. Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), version 6.0. Tulsa, OK, USA: StatSoft Inc., 2001.
18. Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 1992; 304: 1491-4.
19. Parkman HP, Harris AD, Miller MA, Fisher RS. Influence of age, gender, and menstrual cycle on the normal electrogastrogram. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 127-33.
20. Lindberg G, Iwarzon M, Hammarlund B. 24-hour ambulatory electrogastrography in healthy volunteers. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 658-64.