Control and desire: The issue of identity in popular discourses of addiction

Addiction Research and Theory

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 535-543

  Bailey, Lucy ^a  

^a IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Addiction; Agency; Discourse; Expertise; Identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444492651     PISSN: 16066359     EISSN: 14767392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16066350500338195     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Barry, A. Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds) (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government. London: UCL Press.
2. Berridge, V. (1999). Opium and the people: Opium use and drug control policy in nineteenth and early twentieth century England. New York: Free Association Books Ltd.
3. Brodie, J. F., & Redfield, M. (Eds) (2002). High anxieties: Cultural studies in addiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Coupland, J., & Gwyn, R. (Eds) (2003). Discourses, the body, and identity. New York: MacMillan.
5. Davies, J. B. (1992). The myth of addiction: An application of the psychological theory of attribution to illicit drug use. Victoria, Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers.
6. Davies, J. B. (1997). Drugspeak: The analysis of drug discourse. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
7. Du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
8. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. London: Penguin.
9. Foucault, M. (1992). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. 2). London: Penguin.
10. Gronemen, C. (1995). Nymphomania: The historical construction of female sexuality. In: Terry, J. and Urla, J. (Eds) (1995), Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture (pp. 219-49). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
11. Hartsock, N. (1990). Foucault on power: A theory for women? In: Nicholson, L. J. (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (pp. 157-75). London: Routledge.
12. Keane, H. (2002). What's wrong with addiction? Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
13. Melley, T. (2002). A terminal case: William burroughs and the logic of addiction. In: Brodie, J. F. and Redfield, M. (Eds) (2002), High Anxieties: Cultural studies in addiction (pp.38-60). Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Musto, D. F. (1973). The American disease: Origins of narcotic control. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. O'Neill, J. (2004). Five bodies: Re-figuring relationships. London: Sage.
16. Peele, S. (1985). The Meaning of addiction: Compulsive experience and its interpretations. Lexington, massachusetts: Lexington Books.
17. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
18. Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining foucault: Feminism, power and the body. London: Routledge.
19. Sedgwick, E. K. (1993). Tendencies. Durham. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
20. Szasz, T. (1992). Our right to drugs: The case for a free market. New York: Praeger.
21. Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
22. Warhol, R. A. (2002). The rhetoric of addiction: From Victorian Novels to AA. In: Brodie, J. F. and Redfield, M. (Eds) (2002), High anxieties: cultural studies in addiction (pp. 97-108). Berkeley: University of California Press.