Who gains? allocation of freight transport user benefits from international infrastructure projects in multicountry cost-benefit analysis

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1906, 2005, Pages 19-25

  Fosgerau, Mogens ^a   Kristensen, Niels Buus ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; MODEL STRUCTURES; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

FREIGHT TRANSPORT; PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELS; USER BENEFITS;

FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 28444489709     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Rouwendal, J. Indirect Welfare Effects of Price Changes and Cost-Benefit Analysis. Discussion Paper TI 2002-011/3. Tinbergen Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2002.
2. Carlton, D. W. Valuing Market Benefits and Costs in Related Output and Input Markets. American Economic Review, Vol. 69, No. 4, 1979, pp. 688-696.
3. Jara-Diaz, S. R. Relation Between Users' Benefits and the Economic Effects of Transportation Activities. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1986.
4. Trafikministeriet. Economic Assessment of a Fixed Link Across the Fehmarn Belt. 2004. www.trafikministeriet.dk.
5. Trafikministeriet Samfundsøkonomisk vurdering af en fast forbindelse over Femern Bælt. COWI for Danish Ministry of Transport. 2004. www.trafikministeriet.dk.
6. European Commission Decision No. 1692/96/EC. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 1996.
7. Transport and the Economy. Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment (SACTRA), Department of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions, Stationery Office, London, 1999. www.roads.dft. gov.uk/roadnetwork/sactra/ report99/index.htm.
8. Dam, P. U. ADAM : En model af dansk økonomi. Danmarks Statistik, 1995.
9. Knudsen, M., L. H. Pedersen, T. W. Petersen, P. Stephensen, and P. Trier. Danish Rational Economic Agents Model - DREAM, Version 1.2. Statistics Denmark, 1998.
10. Johansson, P. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1993.
11. Trafikministeriet. Brug af samfundsøkonomisk metode i udvalgte lande. 2002. www.trafikministeriet.dk.
12. Fehmarn Belt Traffic Consortium. Fehmarn Belt-Forecast 2002. Trafikministeriet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2003.
13. Fehmarn Belt Traffic Consortium. Fehmarn Belt Traffic Demand Study. Trafikministeriet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999. www.trafikministeriet. dk.
14. Trafikministeriet. Manual for samfundsøkonomisk analyse - anvendt metode og praksis på transportområdet. 2003. www.trafikministeriet. dk.
15. Fosgerau, M., and T. Lund Jensen. Economic Appraisal Methodology- Controversial Issues and Danish Choices. Proc., European Transport Conference. Association for European Transport, London, 2003.
16. Fosgerau, M., and N. Pilegaard. Samfundsøkonomisk vurdering af en fast forbindelse over Femern Bælt. Danish Transport Research Institute. 2004. www.dtf.dk.
17. Kidokoro, Y. Cost-Benefit Analysis for Transport Networks: Theory and Application. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2004, pp. 275-307.