Prey selectivity in pike (Esox lucius), zander (Sander lucioperca) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) under experimental conditions

Biologia - Section Zoology

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 567-570

  Adámek, Zdeněk ^a   Opačak, Andelko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^b JOSIP JURAJ STROSSMAYER UNIVERSITY OF OSIJEK   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Esox lucius; Perca fluviatilis; Predatory fish; Prey; Pseudorasbora parva; Sander lucioperca; Selectivity

Indexed keywords

ASPIUS ASPIUS; CYPRINUS CARPIO; ESOX LUCIUS; GOBIO GOBIO; LEUCISCUS CEPHALUS; PERCA FLUVIATILIS; PSEUDORASBORA PARVA; RUTILUS RUTILUS; SANDER LUCIOPERCA;

EID: 28444489631     PISSN: 13356380     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ADÁMEK, Z. 1993. Predatory behaviour in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Bull. VÚRH Vodňany (29) 4: 115-122.
2. ADÁMEK, Z., FAŠAI, K. & SIDDIQUI, M.A. 1999. Prey selectivity in weis (Silurus glanis) and African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Ribarstvo, Zagreb 57: 47-60.
3. ADÁMEK, Z., JIRÁSEK, J. & SUKOP, I. 1987. The food biology of the economically important fishes in the Dalešice reservoir. Živoč. Výr. 32: 909-920.
4. th Ann. Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia, Vodňany.
5. ADÁMEK, Z. & SIDDIQUI, M. A. 1996. Predation pressure of large-mouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) upon topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva) in comparison with other fishes, pp. 87-94. In: KOZÁK, J. & HAMÁČKOVÁ, J. (eds) II. Česká ichtyologická konference, VÚRH Vodňany.
6. DOMANEVSKIY, L.N. 1962. Available size of a prey for pike. Bjul. Inst. Biol. Vodochran. 12: 50-53.
7. EINFALT, L.M. &: WAHL, D.H. 1997. Prey selection by juvenile walleye as influenced by prey morphology and behavior. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 2618-2626.
8. EKOEV, P. & DIEHL, S. 1994. Piscivore efficiency and refuging prey: The importance of predator search mode. Oecologia 98: 344-353.
9. GREENBERG, L.A., PASZKOWSKI, C.A. & TONN, W.M. 1995. Effects of prey species composition and habitat structure on foraging by two functionally distinct piscivores. Oikos 7: 522-532.
10. HANCZ, C., MATICS, F. & BALÁZSFI, F. 1996. Feeding of one-year-old pike in aquaria, p. 150. In: XX. Halászati Tudományos Tanácskozás, Szarvas.
11. HOROSZEWICZ, L. 1964. Food of predatory fishes in Vistula river. Rocz. Nauk Roln. 84-B-2: 293-314.
12. HORVÁTH, L., TAMÁS, G. & SEAGRAVE, C. 1992. Carp and pond fish culture. Fishing New Books, London, 155 pp.
13. JACOBS, J. 1974. Quantitative measurements of food selection. A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev' s electivity index. Oecologia 14: 413-417.
14. LUNDVALL, D., SVANBÄCK, R., PERSSON, L. & BYSTRÖM, P. 1999. Size-dependent predation in piscivores: interactions between predator foraging and prey avoidance abilities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1285-1292.
15. MARTYNIAK, A., TERLECKI, J & SZCZERBOWSKI, J.A. 1976. Food of pike, chub and burbot in the Lyna river system. Rocz. Nauk Roln. 97-H-2: 63-78.
16. MILLER, P.J. &: LOATES, M.J. 1997. Fish of Brittain& Europe. Harper-Collins Publishers, London, Glasgow, New York, Sydney, Auckland, Toronto, Johannnesburg, 288 pp.
17. NAVARRO, J.E. & JOHNSON, D.L. 1992. Ecology of stocked northern pike in two Lake Erie controlled wetlands. Wetlands 12: 171-177.
18. PELTONEN, H., RITA, H. & RUUHIJAERVI, J. 1996. Diet and prey selection of pikeperch (Stizosteidon lucioperca (L.) in Lake Vesijaervi analyzed with a logit model. Ann. Sci. Fenn. 33: 481-487.
19. POPOVA, O.A. & SYTINA, L.A. 1977. Food and feeding relation of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in various waters of the USSR. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can. 34: 1559-1577.