Robot navigation using biosonar for natural landmark tracking

Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, CIRA

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-7

  Wang, Maosen ^a   Tamimi, Hashem ^a   Zell, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biosonar; Echolocation; Natural landmark

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PATTERN MATCHING; TRACKING (POSITION);

IMAGE MATCHING; LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION; ROBOT NAVIGATION;

MOBILE ROBOTS;

EID: 28444487431     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Akbarally and Kleeman. A sonar sensor for accurate 3d target localisation and clasification. In Proceedings ICTA, Nagoya, pages 3003-308, 1995.
2. Dvon Helversen. Object recogition by echolocation: a nectar-feeding bat exploiting the flowers of a rain forest vine. J Comp Physiol, 189:327-336, 2003.
3. Briechle K and Hanebeck U.D. Template matching using fast normalized cross correlation. In Proceedings of SPIE, V. 4387, Optical Pattern Recognition XII, pages 95-102, 2001.
4. Kimoto and Yuta. Sonar based outdoor navigation. In Proceedings ICAR, pages 239-244, 1993.
5. Roman Kuc. Biomimetic sonar recognizes objects using biaural informations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 102:327-336, Aug. 1997.
6. Leonard and Durran-Whyte. Mobile robot localisation by tracking geometric beacons. In IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, pages 376-382, 1991.
7. J.P. Lewis. Fast normalized cross-correlation. In In Vision Interface, 1995, pages 120-123, 1995.
8. P.J. McKerrow. Robot perception with ultrasonic sensors using data fusion. In Proceedings IEEE S,Man and Cybernetics Conference, pages 1380-1385, 1995.
9. Phillip John Mckrrow and Neil Lindsay Harper. Recognizing leafy plants with in-air sonar. Sensor review, 19:202-206, 1999.
10. Rolf Mller. A computational theory for the classification of natural biosonar targets based on a spike code. Comput Neural Syst, 14:595-612, 2003.
11. Cynthia F. Moss. Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 110(4):2207-2226, Oct. 2001.
12. Carmena J. Hallam Peremans H., Mueller R. A biomimetic platform to study perception in cf-bats. In Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Robotics Systems III, volume 4196, Nov. 2000.
13. Glasberg B. R. and Moore B. C. J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. ar. Res., 47:103-138, 1990.
14. G JONES R ARLETTAZ and PA RACEY. Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats. Nature, 414(6865):742-5, Dec. 2001.
15. Irino T. and Patterson R.D. A time-domain, level-dependent auditory filter: The gammachirp. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 101:412-419, 1997.
16. H. Walker. V.A. Peremans and Hallam. One tone two ears three dimensions: A robotic investigation of pinnae movements used by rhinolophid and hippoisiderid bats. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 104(1):569-579, Aug. 1998.