Postgres-R(SI): Combining replica control with concurrency control based on snapshot isolation

Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 422-433

  Wu, Shuqing ^a   Kemme, Bettina ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE APPLICATIONS; REPLICA CONTROL;

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; CONCURRENCY CONTROL; DATA REDUCTION; FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 28444485949     PISSN: 10844627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICDE.2005.108     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. C. Amza, A. L. Cox, and W. Zwaenepoel. Distributed versioning: Consistent replication for scaling back-end databases of dynamic content web sites. In Middleware '03.
2. C. Amza, A. L. Cox, and W. Zwaenepoel. A comparative evaluation of transparent scaling techniques for dynamic content servers. In Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, 2005.
3. T. Anderson, Y. Breitbart, H. F. Korth, and A. Wool. Replication, consistency, and practicality: Are these mutually exclusive? In ACM SIGMOD Conf., 1998.
4. H. Berenson, P. A. Bernstein, J. Gray, J. Melton, E. J. O'Neil, and P. E. O'Neil. A critique of ANSI SQL isolation levels. In ACM SIGMOD Conf., 1995.
5. P. A. Bernstein, V. Hadzilacos, and N. Goodman. Concurrency Control and Recovery in Database Systems. Addison Wesley, 1987.
6. K. Böhm, T. Grabs, U. Röhm, and H.-J. Schek. Evaluating the coordination overhead of synchronous replica maintenance in a cluster of databases. In Euro-Par, 2000.
7. Y. Breitbart, R. Komondoor, R. Rastogi, S. Seshadri, and A. Silberschatz. Update propagation protocols for replicated databases. In ACM SIGMOD Conf., 1999.
8. E. Cecchet, J. Marguerite, and W. Zwaenepoel. C-JDBC: Flexible database clustering middleware. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, 2004.
9. G. V. Chockler, I. Keidar, and R. Vitenberg. Group communication specifications: A comprehensive study. ACM Computer Surveys, 33(4), 2001.
10. M. Chouk. Master-slave replication, failover and distributed recovery in PostgreSQL database. Master's thesis, McGill University, June 2003.
11. B. S. Corporation. Interbase Documentation, 2004.
12. O. Corporation. Oracle 9i Replication, June 2001.
13. T. P. P. Council. TPC Benchmark W, 2000.
14. K. Daudjee and K. Salem. Lazy database replication with ordering guarantees. In ICDE, 2004.
15. R. Goldring. A discussion of relational database replication technology. InfoDB, 8(1), 1994.
16. J. Gray, P. Heiland, P. O'Neil, and D. Shasha. The dangers of replication and a solution. In ACM SIGMOD Conf., 1996.
17. T. P. G. D. Group. PostgreSQL 7.2 Documentation, 2001.
18. J. Holliday, D. Agrawal, and A. E. Abbadi. The performance of database replication with group communication. In Int. Symp. on Fault-tolerant Computing, 1999.
19. J. Holliday, R. Steinke, D. Agrawal, and A. Abbadi. Epidemic algorithms for replicated databases. TKDE, 15(5), 2003.
20. R. Jiménez-Peris, M. Patiño-Martínez, G. Alonso, and B. Kemme. Are quorums an alternative for data replication. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 28(3), 2003.
21. B. Kemme and G. Alonso. Don't be lazy, be consistent: Postgres-R, a new way to implement database replication. In Int. Conf. on Very Large Databases, 2000.
22. B. Kemme and G. Alonso. A new approach to developing and implementing eager database replication protocols. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 25(3), 2000.
23. J. M. Milan-Franco, R. Jiménez-Peris, M. Patiño- Martínez, and B. Kemme. Adaptive middleware for data replication. In Middleware, 2004.
24. Open Source Development Lab. Descriptions and Documentation of OSDL-DBT-1, 2002.
25. E. Pacitti, P. Minet, and E. Simon. Replica consistency in lazy master replicated databases. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 9(3), 2001.
26. E. Pacitti and E. Simon. Update propagation strategies to improve freshness in lazy master replicated databases. VLDB Journal, 8(3), 2000.
27. F. Pedone, R. Guerraoui, and A. Schiper. Exploiting atomic broadcast in replicated databases. In D. J. Pritchard and J. Reeve, editors, Euro-Par, 1998.
28. PeerDirect. Overview and comparison of data replication architectures. White Paper, Nov. 2002.
29. C. Plattner and G. Alonso. Ganymed: Scalable replication for transactional web applications. In Middleware, 2004.
30. U. Röhm, K. Böhm, H.-J. Schek, and H. Schuldt. FAS - a freshness-sensitive coordination middleware for a cluster of olap components. In VLDB, 2002.
31. R. Schenkel, G. Weikum, N. Weienberg, and X. Wu. Federated transaction management with snapshot isolation. In Transactions and Database Dynamics, Int. Worksh, on Found. of Models and Lang. for Data and Objects, 1999.
32. Spread, homepage: http://www.spread.org/.