Which research is to be believed? The ethics of industrial funding of orthopaedic research

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 87, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1452-1453

  Carr, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPATHY; BONE DISEASE; DRUG INDUSTRY; EDITORIAL; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; IMPLANT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REIMBURSEMENT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPLINT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ETHICS, RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE SECTOR; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDICS; RESEARCH SUPPORT;

EID: 28444477646     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16958     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Kaiser J. Conflict of interest NIH chief clamps down on consulting and stock ownership. Science 2005;307:824-5.
2. Harris G. Agency scientists divided over ethics ban on consulting. New York Times 2005;February 2:417.
3. Weiss R. NIH will restrict outside income: tighter rules address concerns about conflict of interest. Washington Post 2005;February 2:7.
4. Mello MM, Clarridge BR, Studdert DM. Academic medical centers' standards for clinical trial agreements with industry. New England J Med 2005;352:2160-2.
5. Shah RV, Albert TJ, Bruegel-Sanchez V, et al. Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine. Spine 2005;30:1099-104.
6. Brand R, Buckwalter JA, Talman CL, Happe DG. Industrial support of orthopaedic research in the academic setting. Clin Orthop 2003;412:45-53.