One-year clinical outcomes after complete arterial coronary revascularization

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 437-440

  Oster, Hartmut ^a,c   Schwarz, Franz ^b   Störger, Hans ^b   Hofmann, Manfred ^b   Piancatelli, Claudia ^b   Thomas, Jule ^b   Haase, Jürgen ^b  

^a Center for Cardiovascular Diseases   (Germany)

^b Red Cross Hospital Cardiology Center   (Germany)

^c Herz Kreislaufklinik Rotenburg   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; BYPASS SURGERY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FATALITY; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAMMARY ARTERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAMMARY ARTERIES; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SAPHENOUS VEIN; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 28444473818     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2005.00083.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1117-1124.
2. Legrand VMG, Serruys PW, Unger F, et al. Three-year outcome after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease. Circulation 2004;109:1114-1120.
3. Spertus JA, Nerella R, Kettlekamp R, et al. Risk of restenosis and health status outcomes for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 2005;111:768-773.
4. Campeau L, Enjalbert M, Lesperance J, et al. The relation of risk factors to the development of atherosclerosis in saphenous vein bypass grafts and the progression of disease in the native circulation: A study ten years after aortocoronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1329-1332.
5. Bourassa MG, Fate of venous grafts: The past, the present and the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;5:1081-1083.
6. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616-626.
7. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, et al. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts: Effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 1996;334:216-219.
8. Dallan LA, de Oliveira A, Lisboa LA, et al. Complete myocardial revascularization using arterial grafts. Revista Brasileirade Chirurgia. Cardiovascular 1998;13(3):194-197.
9. Bergsma TM, Grandjean JG, Voors AA, et al. Low recurrence of angina pectoris after coronary artery graft with bilateral internal thoracic and right gastroepiploic arteries. Circulation 1998;97:2402-2405.
10. Grandjean JG, Voors AA, Boonstra PW, et al. Exclusive use of arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass operations for three-vessel disease: Use of both thoracic arteries and the gastroepiploic artery in 256 consecutive patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:935-942.
11. Berger PB, Alderman EL, Nadel A, et al. Frequency of early occlusion and stenosis in a left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery bypass graft after surgery through a median sternotomy on conventional bypass. Circulation 1999;100:2353-2358.
12. Leavitt BJ, O'Connor GT, Olmstead EM, et al. Use of the internal mammary artery graft and in-hospital mortality and other adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2001;103:507-512.
13. Khot UN, Friedmann DT, Petterson G, et al. Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts. Circulation 2004;109:2086-2091.
14. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, et al. A randomized comparison of radial artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2302-2309.
15. Chaikhouni A, Crawford FA, Kochel PJ, et al. Human internal mammary artery produces more prostacyclin than saphenous vein. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:88-91.
16. Grondin CM, Campeau L, Lesperance J, et al. Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation. Circulation 1984;70(Suppl I):208-212.
17. Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, Dean P, et al. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: Single versus double grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:202-209.
18. Cooley DA. Coronary bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries and the right gastroepiploic artery. Circulation 1998;97:2384-2385.
19. Zacharias A, Habib RH, Schwann TA, et al. Improved survival with radial artery versus vein conduits in coronary bypass surgery with left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery grafting. Circulation 2004;109:1489-1496.
20. Chardigny C, Jebara VA, Acar C, et al. Vasoreactivity of the radial artery: Comparison with the internal mammary and gastroepiplioc arteries with implications for coronary artery surgery. Circulation 1993;88:II-115-II-127.
21. Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: Pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 1998;97:916-931.