|
|
Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 289-304
|
|
Impotence or importance? Judicial review in an era of explicit NHS rationing.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVE;
SILDENAFIL;
ARTICLE;
ECONOMICS;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HEALTH CARE PLANNING;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
IMPOTENCE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MALE;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (GREAT BRITAIN);
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PFIZER LTD.;
UNITED KINGDOM;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (GREAT BRITAIN);
PFIZER LTD.;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
HEALTH POLICY;
HEALTH PRIORITIES;
HUMANS;
IMPOTENCE;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
MALE;
PIPERAZINES;
STATE MEDICINE;
|
|
EID: 28444473650
PISSN: 00267961
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00487.x Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (25)
|
|
References (0)
|
