The consequences of cobenefits for the efficient design of carbon sequestration programs

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 461-476

  Feng, Hongli ^a   Kling, Catherine L ^b  

^a Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD)   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444465176     PISSN: 00083976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00030.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Burtraw, D., A. Krupnick, K. Palmer, A. Paul, M. Toman and C. Bloyd. 2003. Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 650-73.
2. Ekins, P. and T. Barker. 2001. Carbon taxes and carbon emissions trading. Journal of Economic Survey 15 (3): 325-76.
3. Feng, H. 2005. The dynamics of carbon sequestration and alternative carbon accounting, with an application to the Upper Mississippi River basin. Ecological Economics 54 (1): 23-35.
4. Feng, H., L. A. Kurkalova, C. L. Kling and P. W. Gassman. 2004. Environmental conservation in agriculture: Land retirement versus changing practices on working land. Working Paper, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, 04-WP 365.
5. Follett, R. F., J. M. Kimble and R. Lal. 2001. The Potential of U.S. Grazing Lands to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect. New York: Lewis Publishers, Table 16.1, 410 pp.
6. Iowa Farm Bureau. 2005. Carbon Credit Aggregation Pilot Project Backgrounder. Available at http://www.iowafarmbureau.com/special/carbon/default. aspx, Accessed February.
7. Izaurralde, R. C., J. R. Williams, W. B. McGill and N. J. Rosenberg. 2005. Modeling soil organic carbon changes in CRP land and a long-term crop rotation trial with EPIC. Working Paper, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
8. Lal, R., J. M. Kimble, R. F. Follett and C. V. Cole. 1998. The Potential of U.S. Cropland to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect. Ann Arbor, MI: Sleeping Bear Press.
9. McCarl, B. A. and U. A. Schneider. 2001. Greenhouse gas mitigation in U.S. agriculture and forestry. Science 294 (5551, Dec): 2481-82.
10. Plantinga, A. J. and J. Wu. 2003. Co-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: Evaluating reductions in agricultural externalities from an afforestation policy in Wisconsin. Land Economics 79 (1): 74-85.
11. Thomassin, P. 2003. Canadian agriculture and the development of a carbon trading and offset system. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (5): 1171-77.
12. United States Department of Agriculture, National Resource Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 1997. National Resource Inventory. Available at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/nri/.