Human factors in process control systems: The design of human-machine interfaces

Safety Science

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 5-26

  Nachreiner, Friedhelm ^a   Nickel, Peter ^a   Meyer, Inga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interface design; Process control; Safety; Workload

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

INTERACTION INTERFACE; INTERFACE DESIGN; TASK INTERFACE; WORKLOAD;

PROCESS CONTROL;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROL SYSTEM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; RELIABILITY; TECHNOLOGY; WELLBEING; WORKLOAD;

EID: 28444464471     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.09.003     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. L. Bainbridge Ironies of automation Automatica 19 1983 775 779
2. Bowers, V.A., Snyder, H.L., 1990. Concurrent versus retrospective verbal protocol for comparing window usability. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, HFES, Santa Monica, pp. 1270-1274.
3. M.L. Bransby, and J. Jenkinson The Management of Alarm Systems (Contract Research Report 166/1998) 1998 HSE Books Norwich, UK
4. C.M. Burns, and J.R. Hajdukiewicz Ecological Interface Design 2004 CRC Press Boca Raton
5. G. de Terssac, Y. Queinnec, and P. Thon Horaires de travail et organisation de l'activité de surveillance Le travail humain 46 1983 65 79
6. EEMUA (Engineering Equipment and Materials Users Association), 1999. Alarm systems, a guide to design, management and procurement (Publication No. 191), EEMUA, London.
7. EN 614-2: 2000. Safety of machinery-ergonomic design principles-Part 2: Interactions between the design of machinery and work tasks, CEN, Brussels.
8. HFM, 2004. Operator Functional State Assessment (Technical Report TR-HRM-104 of the NATO Research and Technology Organisation prepared by the Human Factors and Medicine Panel Task Group HFM-056/TG-008). RTO/NATO, Neuilly-sur-Seine.
9. G.R.J. Hockey, A.W.K. Gaillard, and O. Burov Operator Functional State. The Assessment and Prediction of Human Performance Degradation in Complex Tasks 2003 IOS Press Amsterdam
10. HSE (Health and Safety Executive) (Eds.), 1997. The explosion and fires at the Texaco Refinery, Milford Haven, 24 July 1994. A report of the investigation by the Health and Safety Executive into the explosion and fires on the Pembroke Cracking Company Plant at the Texaco Refinery, Milford Haven on 24 July 1994, HSE Books, London.
11. ISO 6385: 2004. Ergonomic principles in the design of work systems, ISO, Geneva.
12. ISO 9241-10: 1996. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 10: Dialogue principles, ISO, Geneva.
13. ISO 9241-11: 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on usability. ISO, Geneva.
14. ISO 10075: 1991. Ergonomic principles related to mental work-load. General terms and definitions, ISO, Geneva.
15. ISO 10075-2: 1996. Ergonomic principles related to mental workload-Part 2: Design principles, ISO, Geneva.
16. ISO/CD 11064-5: Ergonomic design of control centres-Part 5: Displays and controls. (alternative subtitles for Part 5: Displays, Controls, Interactions/Human-system interfaces) (Committee Draft).
17. B.H. Kantowitz, and R.D. Sorkin Human Factors: Understanding People-system Relationships 1983 Wiley New York
18. Kappelmaier, R., 2002. "Human Factors"-Nutzen und Grenzen. In: VDI-Gesellschaft Verfahrenstechnik und Chemieingenieurwesen (Ed.), Anlagen-, Arbeits- und Umweltsicherheit, VDI-GVC, Düsseldorf, pp. Ü 03:1-6.
19. Kutscher, J., Radek, E. (Eds.), 2003. Mensch-Sicherheit-Technik, Gestern-Heute-Morgen, Gestaltung der Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle: Sicherheit und Gesundheitsschutz am Beispiel von Leitwarten und Befahren von Behältern, BG Chemie, Heidelberg.
20. J.D. Lee, and K.A. See Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance Human Factors 46 2004 50 80
21. D. Meister Human Factors: Theory and Practice 1971 Wiley New York
22. Meyer, I., in preparation. Effektivität der Prozessführung und psychische Beanspruchung der Operateure bei unterschiedlich gestalteten Oberflächen eines Prozessleitsystems. Doctoral Dissertation. Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg.
23. Meyer, I., Nickel, P., Schomann, C., Nachreiner, F., 2001. Ergonomische Analysen der Gestaltungsgüte bildschirmgestützter Prozeß leitsysteme-Teil 1: Analyse der Schnittstellengestaltung. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. (GfA) (Ed.), Arbeitsgestaltung, Flexibilisierung, Kompetenzentwicklung, GfA-Press, Dortmund, pp. 55-57.
24. B.M. Muir, and N. Moray Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation Ergonomics 39 1996 429 460
25. Nachreiner, F., 1990. Arbeits- und ingenieurpsychologische Aspekte der Gestaltung von Leitwarten für automatisierte Produktionssysteme. In: Gottlieb Daimler- und Karl Benz Stiftung (Ed.), Einsatz neuer Informations- und Leitsysteme in Verkehr, Prozeßführung, Fertigung, Verlag TÜV Rheinland GmbH, Köln, pp. 421-434.
26. F. Nachreiner Standards on mental workload-the EN ISO 10075 series: from ISO to CEN T. Koukoulaki S. Boy Globalizing Technical Standards. Impact and Challenges for Occupational Health and Safety 2002 European Trade Union Technical Bureau for Health and Safety Brussels 77 92
27. Nachreiner, F., Meyer, I., Schomann, C., Hillebrand, M., 1998. Überprüfung der Umsetzbarkeit der Empfehlungen der ISO 10075-2 in ein Beurteilungsverfahren zur Erfassung der psychischen Belastung, Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven.
28. Nachreiner, F., Meyer, I., Nickel, P., 2002. Human Factors in Prozeßleitsystemen: Gestaltung von Mensch-Maschine-Systemen. In: VDI-Gesellschaft Verfahrenstechnik und Chemieingenieurwesen (Ed.). Anlagen-, Arbeits- und Umweltsicherheit, VDI-GVC, Düsseldorf, pp. F 04:1-6.
29. Nachreiner, F., Nickel, P., Meyer, I., 2003a. Zuverlässigkeit und Bediensicherheit in Prozessleitsystemen-Ergebnisse einer ergonomischen Analyse. In: Giesa, H., Timpe, K.P., Winterfeld, U. (Eds.), Psychologie der Arbeitssicherheit und Gesundheit, 12. Workshop 2003, Asanger, Heidelberg, pp. 189-192.
30. Nachreiner, F., Meyer, I., Nickel, P., 2003b. Human Factors in Process Control Systems: the Design of Man-Machine-Interfaces. In: IVSS (Ed.), The 20th International Symposium "Man-Safety-Technology" of the International Social Security Association-Chemistry Section, BG Chemie, Heidelberg, p. 24.
31. P. Nickel, and F. Nachreiner The suitability of the 0.1 Hz component of heart rate variability for the assessment of mental workload in real and simulated work situations D. de Waard K.A. Brookhuis J. Moraal A. Toffetti Human Factors in Transportation, Communication, Health, and the Workplace 2002 Shaker Maastricht 317 334
32. P. Nickel, and F. Nachreiner Sensitivity and diagnosticity of the 0.1-Hz component of heart rate variability as an indicator of mental workload Human Factors 45 2003 575 590
33. P. Nickel, and F. Nachreiner Differential usability of paper-based and computer-based work documents for control room operators in the chemical process industry D. de Waard K.A. Brookhuis R. van Egmond T. Boersema Human Factors in Design, Safety, and Management 2005 Shaker Publishing Maastricht 299 314
34. Nickel, P., Nachreiner, F., Meyer, I., 2004a. Aufgabenangemessenheit-Zur Übertragbarkeit eines ergonomischen Gestaltungsgrundsatzes von Büro- auf Prozessleitsysteme. In: Bungard, W., Koop, B., Liebig, C. (Eds.), Psychologie und Wirtschaft leben. Aktuelle Themen der Wirtschaftspsychologie in Forschung und Praxis, Hampp, München, pp. 137-143.
35. Nickel, P., Meyer, I., Nachreiner, F., 2004b. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Übertragbarkeit von (software-)ergonomischen Grundsätzen der Dialoggestaltung von Büro- auf Prozessleitsysteme. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. (GfA) (Ed.), Arbeit + Gesundheit in effizienten Arbeitssystemen, GfA-Press, Dortmund, pp. 463-466.
36. J. Nielsen Usability Engineering 1993 Academic Press Boston
37. R. Parasuraman Adaptive Automation Matched to Human Mental Workload G.R.J. Hockey A.W.K. Gaillard O. Burov Operator Functional State. The Assessment and Prediction of Human Performance Degradation in Complex Tasks 2003 IOS Press Amsterdam 177 193
38. R. Parasuraman, and V.A. Riley Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse Human Factors 39 1997 230 253
39. R. Parasuraman, T.B. Sheridan, and C.D. Wickens A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans 30 2000 286 297
40. Reason, J., 2000. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot, Ashgate.
41. M.M. Sanders, and E.J. McCormick Human Factors in Engineering and Design 1993 McGraw-Hill New York
42. Schomann, C., Meyer, I., Nickel, P., Nachreiner, F., 2001. Ergonomische Analysen der Gestaltungsgüte bildschirmgestützter Prozeß leitsysteme-Teil 2: Psychische Beanspruchung bei der Arbeit an Prozeßleitsystemen. In: Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e.V. (GfA) (Ed.), Arbeitsgestaltung, Flexibilisierung, Kompetenzentwicklung, GfA-Press, Dortmund, pp. 59-62.
43. T.B. Sheridan Reflections on human-centered automation K.-P. Gärtner W. Stein H. Widdel Mensch-Maschine-Systeme und Neue Informationstechnologien 1994 Verlag der Augustinus Buchhandlung Aachen 19 24
44. T.B. Sheridan Function allocation: algorithm, alchemy or apostasy? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52 2000 203 216
45. T.B. Sheridan Humans and Automation. System Design and Research Issues 2002 Wiley/HFES Santa Monica
46. W.T. Singleton Man-machine Systems 1974 Penguin Harmondsworth
47. E. Ulich Arbeitspsychologie 2001 VdF Zürich
48. C.D. Wickens, and J.G. Hollands Engineering Psychology and Human Performance 2000 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River
49. D.D. Woods Decomposing automation: apparent simplicity, real complexity R. Parasuraman M. Mouloua Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications 1996 LEA Mahwah 1 17