Initial effects of anti-pronation tape on the medial longitudinal arch during walking and running

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 939-943

  Vicenzino, B ^a   Franettovich, M ^a   McPoil, T ^b   Russell, T ^a   Skardoon, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOOT; HEIGHT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOGGING; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; RUNNING; STANDARDIZATION; STANDING; TECHNIQUE; VIDEORECORDING; WALKING;

ADULT; BANDAGES; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; FOOT INJURIES; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRONATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RUNNING; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; WALKING;

EID: 28444461791     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.019158     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hrejac A, Marshall RN, Hume PA. Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners. Meet Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:1635-41.
2. Williams DS, McClay IS. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther 2000;80:864-71.
3. Williams DS, McClay IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clin Biomech 2001;16:341-7.
4. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Phys Med Rehabil 1995,76:45-9.
5. Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, et al. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:585-93.
6. Tomaro JE, Burdett RG, Chadran AM. Subtalar joint motion and the relationship to lower extremity overuse injuries. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1996;86:427-32.
7. Holmes CF, Wilcox D, Fletcher JP. Effect of a modified, LowDye medial longitudinal arch taping procedure on the subtalar joint neutral position before and after light exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002;32:194-201.
8. Hintermann B, Nigg BM. Pronation in runners: implications for injuries. Sports Med 1998;26:169-76.
9. Vicenzino B, Feilding J, Howard R, et al. An investigation of the anti-pronation effect of two taping methods after application and exercise. Gait Posture 1997;5:1-5.
10. Vicenzino B, Griffiths SR, Griffiths LA, et al. Effect of anti-pronation tape and temporary orthotic on vertical navicular height before and after exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000;30:333-9.
11. Ator R, Gunn K, McPoil TG, et al. The effect of adhesive strapping on medial longitudinal arch support before and after exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991;14:18-23.
12. Menz HB. Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1998;88:119-28.
13. Evans AM, Copper AW, Scharfbillig RW, et al. Reliability of the foot posture index and traditional measures of foot position. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003;93:203-13.
14. Tranber R, Karslson D. The relative skin movement of the foot: a 2-D roentgen photogrammetry study. Clin Biomech 1998;13:71-6.
15. Scranton PE, Pedegana LR, Whitesel JP. Gait analysis: alterations in support phase forces using supportive devices. Am J Sports Med 1982;10:6-11.
16. Russo SJ, Chipchase LS. The effect of LowDye taping on peak plantar pressures of normal feet during gait. Aust J Physiother 2001;47:239-44.
17. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Reliability and validity of center-of-pressure quantification. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003;93:142-9.
18. Cavanagh PR, Morag E, Boulton AJM, et al. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech 1997;30:243-50.
19. Hamill J, Bates BT, Knutzen KM, et al. Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity measures. Clin Biomech 1989;4:217-25.
20. Mueller MJ, Host JV, Norton BJ. Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1993;83:198-202.
21. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Motion of the calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal during the stance phase of walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002;92:67-76.
22. Russell T, Jull G, Wootton R. Can the internet be used as a medium to evaluate knee angle? Man Ther 2003;8:242-6.
23. Russell T, Wootton R, Jull G. Physical outcome measurements via the internet: reliability at two internet speeds. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8(suppl 3):50-2.
24. Russell T, Wootton R, Jull G. Low bandwidth physical rehabilitation via the internet. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9(suppl 2):88-9.