Paradoxical sensation of nasal airflow in patients with common cold. Are we measuring the correct modality?

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 125, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1307-1311

  Clarke, Jonathan ^a   Eccles, Ronald ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Nasal obstruction; Rhinomanometry; Sensation of nasal airflow

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMON COLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; NOSE AIRFLOW; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; RHINOMANOMETRY; SENSATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; COHORT STUDIES; COMMON COLD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NASAL MUCOSA; NASAL OBSTRUCTION; REFERENCE VALUES; RHINOMANOMETRY; SENSATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 28444447082     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480510043404     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Jones AS, Willatt DJ, Durham LM. Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation. J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:909-11.
2. Panagou P, Loukides S, Tsipra S, Syrigou K, Anastasakis C, Kalogeropoulos N. Evaluation of nasal patency: comparison of patient and clinician assessments with rhinomanometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1998;118:847-51.
3. Yaniv E, Hadar T, Shvero J, Raveh E. Objective and subjective nasal airflow. Am J Otolaryngol 1997;18:29-32.
4. Sipilä J, Suonpää J, Silvoniemi P, Laippala P. Correlations between subjective sensation of nasal patency and rhinomanometry in both unilateral and total nasal assessment. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1995;57:260-3.
5. Hirschberg A, Rezek O. Correlation between objective and subjective assessments of nasal patency. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1998;60:206-11.
6. Eccles R. The relationship between subjective and objective measures of nasal function. Jpn J Rhinol 1998;37:61-9.
7. Gronborg H, Winther B, Brofeldt S, et al. Effects of oral norephedrine on common cold systems. Rhinology 1983;21:3-12.
8. Eccles R, Jawad MS, Morris S. The effects of oral administration of (-)-menthol on nasal resistance to airflow and nasal sensation of airflow in subjects suffering from nasal congestion associated with the common cold. J Pharm Pharmacol 1990;42:652-4.
9. Eccles R, Jawad MS, Jawad SS, Angello JT, Druce HM. Efficacy and safety of single and multiple doses of pseudoephedrine (60mg) in the treatment of nasal congestion associated with common cold. Am J Rhinol 2005;19:25-31.
10. Burrow A, Eccles R, Jones AS. The effects of camphor, eucalyptus and menthol vapour on nasal resistance to airflow and nasal sensation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1983;96: 157-61.
11. Isenberg C, Schafer K, Braun HA. The effect of menthol on discharge pattern of cold receptors. Pflugers Arch 1984;400:R17.
12. Scahfer K, Braun HA, Isenberg C. Effect of menthol on cold receptor activity. J Gen Physiol 1986;88:757-76.
13. Jones AS, Crosher R, Wight RG, Lancer JM, Beckingham E. The effect of local anaesthesia of the nasal vestibule on nasal sensation of airflow and nasal resistance. Clin Otolaryngol 1987;12:461-4.
14. Jones AS, Lancer JM, Shone GR, Stevens JC. The effect of lignocaine on nasal resistance and nasal sensation of airflow. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1986;101:328-30.
15. Eccles R, Morris S, Tolley NS. The effects of nasal anaesthesia upon nasal sensation of airflow. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1988;106:152-5.
16. Jones AS, Wright RG, Durnam LH. The distribution of thermal receptors within the nasal cavity. Clin Otolaryngol 1989;14:235-9.