The ESOP-HA modular cementless femoral stem: A study of the results of 165 hip arthroplasties with a minimum of 10-year follow-up

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 275-285

  Philippe, Michel P ^a   Martin, Elvira ^b   Hummer, Jacques ^c   Gacon, Gérard ^e   Dambreville, Alain ^d   Ray, André ^e  

^a Centre d'Evaluation Scientifique et Médical André Hermann   (France)

^b AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Polyclinique de Gentilly   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NICE   (France)

^e CLINIQUE DU PARC   (France)

Author keywords

Cementless; Femoral stem; Modularity; Survival curve; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ACETABULUM; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; METAPHYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME;

EID: 28444436617     PISSN: 09484817     EISSN: 14321068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-005-0002-y     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Epinette JA, Manley M (2004) Fifteen years of clinical experience with hydroxyapatite coating in joint arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin
2. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassmann AH (1987) Porous coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth stress shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:45-51
3. Heydley AK, Gruen TA, Borden LS (1987) Two years follow-up of the PCA non-cemented total hip replacement in The Hip Society 1 vol. MOSBY St LOUIS, 225
4. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Ghazal ME (1994) Pain in the thigh following total hip replacement with a porous coated anatomic prosthesis for osteoarthrosis. A five-year study J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 76:1464-1470
5. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Heegaard JH (1989) Variations radiologiques des paramètres anatomiques du fémur proximal en fonction de sa position en rotation. Rev Chir Orthop 75:209-215
6. Trotter M, Peterson RR (1967) Transverse diameter of the femur on roentgenograms and on bones. Clin Orthop 1967 52:233-239
7. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindaul LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop 235:148-165
8. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubagnac JM, Argenson JN, Esteve P, Roguin B (1992) The morphology of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 74:28-32
9. Fessy MH, Bejui J, Fischer LP, Bouchet A (1995) The upper end of the femur: dimensions of the endosteal canal. Surg Radiol Ann 17:155-160
10. Delaunay C, Kapandji AI (1998) Survie á 10 ans des prothèses totales de ZWEIMULLER en arthroplastie primaire non cimentée de hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 84:412-421
11. Vresilovic EJ, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH (1996) Incidence of thigh pain after uncemented total hip arthroplasty as a function of femoral stem size. J Arthroplasty 11(3):304-311
12. Merle D'aubigne R (1970) Cotation chiffrée de la fonction de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 56:481-486
13. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 51:737-755
14. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 257:107-128
15. Epinette JA, Geesink RGT (1994) Radiographic assessment of Cementless Hip Prostheses: ARA, a proposal New Scoring System. Cahiers d'Enseignement de la SOFCOT, 50, Expansion Scient. Française, 114-126.1 vol. PARIS
16. Gruen TA, Macneice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stem type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17-21
17. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CG (1988) The uncemented porous coated anatomic prosthesis: two year results of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 70:337-346
18. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 55:1629-1632
19. Rossi P, Sibelli P, Fumero S, Crua E (1995) Short-term results of hydroxyapatite-coated primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 310:98-102
20. Robinson RP, Deysine GR, Green MT (1996) Uncemented total hip arthroplasty using the CLS stem: a titanium alloy implant with a corundum blast finish. Results at a mean 6 years in a prospective study. J Arthroplasty 1:286-292
21. Rokkum M, Reigstad A (1999) Total hip replacement with an entirely Hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 14(6):689-700
22. Laine HJ, Lehto MUK, Moilanen T (2000) Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal. J Arthroplasty 1:86-92
23. Poss R, Walker P, Spector M (1988) and coworkers: strategies for improving fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 235:181-194
24. Capello WN (1989) Fit the patient to the prosthesis: an argument against the routine use of custom hip implants. Clin Orthop 249:56-59
25. Robertson DD, Walker PS, Granholm JW, Nelson PC, Fishman EK, Magid D (1987) Design of custom hip stem prostheses using three-dimensional CT modelling. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:804-809
26. Summer DR, Turner TM (1988) The effects of femoral component design features on femoral modelling: in non cemented total hip arthroplasty. 143-155 Edit: FITZGERALD R Raven Press, 1 Vol. New-York
27. Walker PS, Schneeweis PB, Murphy S, Nelson P (1987) Strain and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prosthesis. J Biomech 20:693-702
28. Whiteside LA, Arima J, White SE, Branam L, Mac Carthy DS (1994) Fixation of the modular total hip femoral component in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 298:184-190
29. Soballe K, Hansen ES, Rasmussen HB, Bunger C (1994) Fixation of porous coated versus HA coated implants. Cahiers d'Enseignement de la SOFCOT, 50, Expansion Scient. Française, 71-84, 1 vol. PARIS
30. Bloebaum RD, Beeks D, Dorr LD, Savory CG, Du Pont JA, Hofmann AA (1994) Complications with hydroxyapatite particulate separation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 298:19-26
31. D'antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT (1996) Remodelling of bone around hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 78:1226-1234
32. Onsten I, Carlsson AS, Sanzen L, Besjakov J (1996) Migration and wear of a hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis. A controlled roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78:85-91
33. Donnely WJ, Kobayashi A, Freeman MA, Chin TW, Yeo H, West M, Scott G (1997) Radiological and survival comparison of four methods of fixation of a proximal femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79:351-360
34. Yee AJM, Kreder HK, Bookman I, Davey JR (1999) A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 366:120-132
35. Schmalzried TP, Callaghan JJ (1999) Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 81:115-136
36. Barrack RL, Burke DW, Cook SD, Skinner HB, Harris WH (1993) Complications related to modularity of total hip components. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75:688-692
37. Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, Dujovne AR, Brooks CE (1994) Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 298:27-36
38. Chmell MJ Poss R (1995) Avantages et désavantages de la modularité des prothèses totales de hanche. Conférences d'Enseignement de la SOFCOT, 52, Expansion Scient. Française, 1-10. 1 vol. Paris
39. Cameron HU (1994) The two to six year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop 298:47-53
40. Andress HJ, Lob G, Kahl S and coworkers (1999) Development of a new modular titanium femoral prosthesis consisting of a head and shaft component. Indications, operation and optimization of the tapered socket connection. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 9:13-18