Brief Report: Health services research in the privacy age

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1045-1049

  Hess, Rachel ^a   Matthews, Karen ^a,b   McNeil, Melissa ^a   Chang, ChungChou H ^a,b   Kapoor, Wishwa ^a   Bryce, Cindy ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized data collection; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; Health services research; Privacy; Research registry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPERTENSION; INTERNET; MALE; MARRIAGE; MEDICAL ETHICS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; AGED; COMPUTER; CONFIDENTIALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPUTERS; CONFIDENTIALITY; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 28444435924     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0227.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Health Insurance Portability and Acountabilty Act. 1996.
2. Department of Health and Human Services. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information; proposed rule. The Federal Register. 1999;64:59918-60065.
3. Woolf SHL, et al. Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9: 1111-8.
4. Kennedy L, Craig AM. Global registries for measuring pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes: focus on design and data collection, analysis and interpretation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22: 551-68.
5. Hays RD, Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001;33:350-7.
6. Hays RD. RAND 36: Health Status Inventory. 1st ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1998:126.
7. Quinn J, Durski K. A real-time tracking, notification, and web-based enrollment system for emergency department research. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1245-8.
8. Matthews KA, Kelsey SF, Meilahn EN, Kuller LH, Wing RR. Educational attainment and behavioral and biologic risk factors for coronary heart disease in middle-aged women. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:1132-44.
9. Sowers M. SWAN: a multicenter, multiethnic, community-based cohort study of women and the menopausal transition. In: Lobo RA, Kelsey J, Marcus R, eds. Menopause: Biology and Pathobiology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000:672.
10. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rossouw JE, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers, hormone replacement therapy, and incident coronary heart disease: prospective analysis from the women's health initiative observational study. JAMA. 2002;288:980-7.
11. Bliven BD, Kaufman SE, Spertus JA. Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:15-22.