The IUD in evolution

Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

Volumn 51, Issue 12 SUPPL., 1996, Pages

  Westhoff, Carolyn ^a,b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b School of Medicine ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE;

CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS--HISTORY; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; ECONOMIC FACTORS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; IUD--HISTORY; KNOWLEDGE; NEWBORN; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; PREGNANCY; PRODUCT APPROVAL; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE;

AMERICAS; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS--HISTORY; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC FACTORS; FAMILY PLANNING; IUD--HISTORY; KNOWLEDGE; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; PRODUCT APPROVAL; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, COPPER; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, MEDICATED; PREGNANCY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2842518991     PISSN: 00297828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006254-199612000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Graefenberg E. An intrauterine contraceptive method. In: Sanger M, Stone HM, eds. The Practice of Contraception. Proceedings of the 7th International Birth Control Conference. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1930, pp 33-47.
2. Ota T. A study on birth control with an intrauterine instrument. Jpn J Obstet Gynecol 1934;17:210-214.
3. Oppenheimer W. Prevention of pregnancy by the Grafenberg ring method: A re-evaluation after 28 years' experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1959;78:446-454.
4. Guttmacher AF. Intrauterine contraceptive devices. The 8th Oliver Bird Lecture presented at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. J Reprod Fertil 1965;10:115-128.
5. Lippes J. A study of intrauterine contraception: Development of a plastic loop. In: Tietze C, Lewit S, eds. Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices (International Congress Series No. 54). Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1962, pp 69-75.
6. Tietze C, Lewit S. Evaluation of intrauterine devices: Ninth progress report of the Cooperative Statistical Program. Stud Fam Plann 1970;1:1-40.
7. Tatum HJ, Schmidt FH, Phillips DM. Morphological studies of Dalkon Shield tails removed from patients. Contraception 1975;11:465.
8. Lee NC, Rubin GL, Ory HW et al. Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. J Am Coll Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:1-6.
9. Zipper JA, Medel M, Pragger R. Suppression of fertility by intrauterine copper and zinc in rabbits: A new approach to intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969;105: 529-534.
10. Tatum HJ. Intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;112:1000-1023.
11. Sivin I, Stern J. Long-acting, more effective Copper T IUDs: A summary of U.S. experience, 1970-1975. Stud Fam Plann 1979;10:263-281.
12. Rowe PJ. Clinical performance of copper IUDs. In: Bardin CW, Mishell DR Jr, eds. Proceedings from the Fourth International Conference on IUDs, Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994, p 13-31.
13. Rosenberg MJ, Foldesy R, Mishell DR et al. Performances of the TCu 380A and Cu-Fix IUDs in an International Randomized Trial. Contraception 1996;53:197-203.
14. World Health Organization. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction: Ninth annual report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
15. World Health Organization. WHO Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for Fertility Regulation: The Alza T IPCS52, a longer acting progesterone IUD: Safety and efficacy compared to the TCu 220C and Multiload 250 in two randomized multicentre trials. Clin Reprod Fertil 1983;2:113-128.
16. Luukkainen T, Allonen H, Haukkamaa M et al. Five years' experience with levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs. Contraception 1986;33:139-148.
17. Medical Device Amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 360-3061).
18. National Center for Health Statistics. Contraceptive use, United States, 1982. Vital & Health Statistics, Data from the National Survey of Family Growth Series 23 (12), 1986.
19. Burkman RT, Lee NC, Ory HW et al. Response to the intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease: The Women's Health Study reanalyzed. J Clin Epidemiol 1991:44:(Comment) 123-125; (Discussion) 211-213.
20. Cramer DW, Schiff I, Schoenbaum SC et al. Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device. N Engl J Med 1985;312:937-941.
21. Daling JR, Weiss NS, Metch BJ et al. Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intrauterine device. N Engl J Med 1985;312:937-941.
22. Westhoff C, Marks F, Rosenfield A et al. Clinical and legal factors influencing IUD use in the United States. In: Bardin CW, Mishell DR Jr, eds. Proceedings from the Fourth International Conference on IUDs. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994.
23. Westhoff C, Marks F, Rosenfield A. Residency training in contraception, sterilization, and abortion. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:311-314.