In vitro testing for allergic contact dermatitis;In-vitro-tests zum nachweis von kontaktallergien

Hautarzt

Volumn 56, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1141-1143

  Brehler, R ^a,c   Merk, H ^b  

^a UKM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allergen specific lymphocytes; Contact allergies; Lymphocytetransformation test; Patch testing; Type IV allergies

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ALLERGEN; IRRITANT AGENT;

ALLERGIC REACTION; ARTICLE; IN VITRO STUDY; LYMPHOCYTE; LYMPHOCYTE TRANSFORMATION TEST; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATHOGENESIS; SAFE SEX; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

ALLERGENS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DRUG ERUPTIONS; EPITOPES; GERMANY; HUMANS; LYMPHOCYTE CULTURE TEST, MIXED; PATCH TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 28344456241     PISSN: 00178470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00105-005-1056-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Basketter D, Menné T (2005) Lymphocyte transformation test in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 53:1
2. Brasch J, Grabbe J (1997) More positive patch test reactions with larger test chambers? Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Contact Derm 37:118-120
3. Brehler R, Hellweg B (1995) Beurteilung von Epikutantestreaktionen nach Empfehlungen der Deutschen Kontaktallergie-Gruppe (DKG). Dtsch Derm 43:688-690
4. Brehler R, Becker D, Merck H (1998) MELISA-In-Vitro-Test zum Nachweis einer Kontaktallergie? Eine Stellungnahme der Deutschen Kontaktallergie-Gruppe. Hautarzt 49:418-419
5. Cederbrant K, Gunnarsson LG, Hultman P et al. (1999) In-vitro lymphoproliferative assays with Hg-Cl2 can not identify patients with systemic symptoms attributed to dental amalgam. J Dent Res 78:1450-1458
6. Cederbrant K, Gunnarsson LG, Marcusson JA (2000) Mercury intolerance and lymphocyte transformation test with nickel sulfate, palladium chloride, mercuric chloride, and gold sodium thiosulfate. Environ Res 84:140-144
7. Hagemann T, Schlütter-Böhmer B, Allam JP et al. (2005) Positive lymphocyte transformation test in a patient with allergic contact dermatitis of the scalp after short term use of topical minoxidil solution. Contact Dermatitis 53:53-55
8. Hosoi J, Hariya T, Denda M, Tsuchiya T (2000) Regulation of the cutaneous allergic reaction by humidity. Contact Dermatitis 42:81-84
9. Jakobson E, Masjedi K, Ahlborg N et al. (2002) Cytokine production in nickel-sensitized individuals analysed with enzyme-linked immunospot assay: possible implication for diagnosis. Br J Dermatol 147:442-449
10. Lindemann M, Bohmer J, Zabel M, Grosse-Wilde H (2003) ELISpot: a new tool for the detection of nickel sensitization. Br Clin Exp Allergy 33:992-998
11. Merk HF, Abel J, Baron JM, Krutmann J (2004) Molecular pathways in dermatotoxicology. Toxicol Applied Pharmacol 195:267-277
12. Moed H, M, Bruynzeel DP, Scheper R et al. (2005) Improved detection of allergen-specific T-cell responses in allergic contact dermatitis through the addition of "cytokine cocktails". Exp Dermatol 14:634-640
13. Podzimek S, Prochazkova J, Pribylova L et al. (2003) Effect of heavy metals on immune reactions in patients with infertility. Cas Lek Cesk 142:285-288
14. Prochazkova J, Sterzl I, Kucerova H et al. (2004) The beneficial effect of amalgam replacement on health in patients with autoimmunity. Neuroendocrinol Lett 25:211-218
15. Rasanen L, Kaipiainen-Seppanen O, Myllykangas-Luosujarvi R et al. (1999) Hypersesnitivity to gold in gold sodiumthiomalate-induced dermatosis. Br J Dermatol 141:683-688
16. Rustemeyer T, von Blomberg BM, van Hoogstraten IM et al. (2004) Analysis of effector and regulatory immune reactivity to nickel. Clin Exp Allergy 34:1458-1466
17. Sachs B, Erdmann S, al Masaoudi T, Merk HF (2001) Molecular features determining lymphocyte reactivity in allergic contact dermatitis to chloramphenicol and azidamphenicol. Allergy 56:69-72
18. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Gefeller O (2002) Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug-utilization research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Derm 47:32-39
19. Sieben S, Hertl M, Massaoudi TA et al. (2001) Characterization of T cell responses to fragrances. Toxicol Applied Pharmacol 172:172-178
20. Sieben S, Kawakubo Y, Massaoudi TA et al. (2002) Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to paraphenylendiamine is mediated by 2 different pathways of antigen recognition by specific αβ+human T-cell clones. J Allergy Clin Immunol 109:1005-1101
21. Stejskal VD, Danersund A, Lindvall A et al. (1999) Metal-specific lymphocytes: biomarkers of sensitivity in man. Neuroendocrinol Lett 20:289-298
22. Sterzl I, Prochazkova J, Hrda P et al. (1999) Mercury and nickel allergy: risk factors in fatigue and autoimmunity. Neuroendocrinol Lett 20:221-228
23. Valentine-Thon E, Schiwara HW. Validity of MELISA for metal sensitivity testing. Neuroendocrinol Lett 2003;24:57-64
24. Wahlberg JE (2001) Patch testing. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 435-468