Systematics of the genus Bagre (Siluriformes: Ariidae): A morphometric approach

Cybium

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 127-133

  Acero P , Arturo ^a   Tavera, José Julián ^b   Reyes, Javier ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

^c Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas Y Costeras   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Ariidae; ASE; ASW; Bagre; Morphometrics; Phylogenetic; Sea catfishes

Indexed keywords

ARIIDAE; ARIOPSIS SEEMANNI; ARIUS PLATYPOGON; BAGRE; BAGRE BAGRE; BAGRE MARINUS; BAGRE PINNIMACULATUS; SILURIFORMES;

EID: 28344455350     PISSN: 03990974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ACERO P.A., 2002. - Family Ariidae. In: The living marine Resources of the western central Atlantic (Carpenter K.E., ed.), pp. 831-852. Rome: FAO.
2. nd edit. (Hutchins M., Thoney D.A., Loiselle P.V. & N. Schlager, eds), Vol. 4-5, Fishes I-II, pp. 351-367. Farmington Hills, USA: Gale Group.
3. ACERO P.A. & R. BETANCUR-R., 2002. - Arius cookei, a new species of ariid catfish from the tropical American Pacific. Aqua J. Ichtyol. Aquat. Biol., 5: 133-138.
4. ADAMS D.C. & M.S. ROSENBERG, 1998. - Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: A comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995). Syst. Biol., 47: 168-173.
5. BETANCUR-R. R. & A. ACERO P., in press. - Description of Cathorops mapale, a new species of ariid catfish (Pisces: Siluriformes) from the Colombian Caribbean, based on morphological and mitochondrial evidence. Zootaxa.
6. BETANCUR-R. R., ACERO P. A. & L.M. MEJÍA-LADINO, 2003. - Sistemática filogenética preliminar de algunos bagres marinos (Siluriformes: Ariidae) neotropicales. Mem. Fund. La Salle Cienc. Nat., 158: 68-81.
7. BOOKSTEIN F.L., 1989. - Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell., 11: 567-585.
8. BOOKSTEIN F.L., 1991. - Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. 435 p. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
9. BOOKSTEIN F.L., 1996. - Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. In: Advances in Morphometrics (Marcus L.F., Corti M., Loy A., Naylor G.J.P. & D. Slice, eds), pp. 131-151. New York: Plenum Press.
10. BROOKS D.R., CAIRA J.N., PLATT T.R. & M.R. PRITCHARD, 1984. - Principles and methods of phylogenetic systematics: A cladistics workbook. Univ. Kansas, Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ., 12: 1-92.
11. CADRIN S.X. & K.D. FRIEDLAND, 1999. - The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fish. Res., 43: 129-139.
12. CERVIGÓN F., 1991. - Los Peces marinos de Venezuela. Vol I. 423 p. Caracas: Seg. Ed. Fundación Científica Los Roques.
13. CHAPMAN R.E., 1990. - Shape analysis in the study of dinosaur morphology. In: Dinosaur Systematics: Perspectives and Approaches (Carpenter K. & P.J. Currie, eds), pp. 21-42. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
14. CHAPMAN R.E., WEISHAMPEL D.B., HUNT G. & D. RASSKIN-GUTMAN, 1997. - On using the shapes of dinosaurs. Dinofest Int. Proc., 3: 31-37.
15. FELSENSTEIN J., 1988. - Phylogenetics and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 19: 445-471.
16. FELSENSTEIN J., 2001. - PHYLIP v.3.6, Phylogeny Inference Package. Washington Univ. 1999-2001.
17. KAILOLA P.J. & W.A. BUSSING, 1995. - Ariidae, bagres marinos. In: Guía FAO para la Identificación de Especies para los Fines de la Pesca. Pacífico centro-oriental. Vol. II. Vertebrados. Parte 1 (Fischer W., Krupp F., Schneider W., Sommer C., Carpenter K.E. & V.H. Niem, eds), pp. 860-886. Rome: FAO.
18. LITTMANN M.W., BROOKS M.B. & P. NASS, 2000. - Sorubium cuspicaudus, a new long-whiskered catfish from northwestern South America (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 113: 900-917.
19. LOY A. & M. CORTI, 1996. - Distribution of Talpa europea (Mammalia, Insectivora, Talpidae) in Europe: A biogeographic hypothesis based on morphometric data. Ital. J. Zool., 63: 277-284.
20. MARCENIUK A.P., 1997. - Revisão sistemática do gênero Cathorops (Osteichthyes; Siluriformes, Ariidae). M. Sc. Thesis, 315 p. Univ. São Paulo, Brasil.
21. MARCUS L.F., HINGST-ZAHER E. & H. ZAHER, 2000. - Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix, 11: 27-47.
22. MONTEIRO R.L., 2000. - Why morphometrics is special: The problem with using partial warps as characters for phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol., 49: 796-800.
23. PINNA DE M., 1991. - Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics, 7: 367-394.
24. ROHLF F.J., 1990. - Morphometrics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 21: 299-316.
25. ROHLF F.J., 1996. - Morphometrics spaces, shape components and the effects of linear transformations. In: Advances in Morphometrics (Marcus L.F., Corti M., Loy A., Naylor G.J.P. & D. Slice, eds), pp. 131-151. New York: Plenum Press.
26. ROHLF F.J., 1998a. - TPSsuper. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. New York: Stony Brook.
27. ROHLF F.J., 1998b. - On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Syst. Biol., 47: 147-158.
28. ROHLF F.J., 1998c. - TPSrelw. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. New York: Stony Brook.
29. ROHLF F.J., 1999a. - TPStree. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. New York: Stony Brook.
30. ROHLF F.J., 1999b. - Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classif., 16: 197-223.
31. ROHLF F.J., 2000. - Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am. J. Phys. Anthr., 111: 463-478.
32. ROHLF F.J., 2002. - Geometric morphometrics in systematics. In: Morphology, Shape and Phylogenetics (Macleod N. & P. Forey, eds), pp. 175-193. London: Taylor & Francis.
33. ROHLF F.J., 2003. - TPSdig v.1.39. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. New York: Stony Brook.
34. ROHLF F.J. & D. SLICE, 1990. - Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool., 39: 40-59
35. ROTH V.L. & J.M. MERCER, 2000. - Morphometrics in development and evolution. Am. Zool., 40: 801-810.
36. STRACAHAN N.J. & L. KELL, 1995. - A potential method for the differentiation between haddock fish stocks by computer vision using canonical discriminant analysis. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 5: 146-150.
37. SWIDERSKI D.L., ZELDITCH M.L.& W.L. FINK, 1998. - Why morphometrics is not special: Coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol., 47: 508-519.
38. SWIDERSKI D.L., ZELDICHT M.L. & W.L. FINK, 2000. - Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines. Hystrix, 11: 49-75.
39. ZELDTICH M.L., FINK W.L. & D.L. SWIDERSKI, 1995. - Morphometrics, homology and phylogenetics: Quantified characters as synapomorphies. Syst. Biol., 44: 179-189.
40. ZELDITCH M.L., FINK W.L., SWIDERSKI D.L. & B.L. LUNDRIGAN, 1998. - On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny: A reply to Rohlf. Syst. Biol., 47: 159-167.